Motor Exercises Effect on Improving Shoulders Functioning, Functional Ability, Quality of Life, Depression and Anxiety For Women With Breast Cancer

Charati, Fahimeh Ghasemi; Shojaee, Leyla; Haghighat, Sahar; Esmaeili, Ravanbakhsh; Madani, Zahra; Charati, Jamshid Yazdani; Hosseini, Seyed Hamzeh; Shafipour, Vida

doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2022.07.009

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Taso CJ et al found that 8-week yoga exercise could reduced fatigue in patients with breast cancer but did not reduce depression or anxiety (30). Motor exercises had positive effects on decreasing patients' anxiety and depression symptoms (31). In this study, we applied progressive rehabilitation exercise system for breast cancer patients and achieved desirable outcome.…”

Section: 9quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 82%

Effects of progressive physical exercises combined with equipment-assisted training on postoperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients underwent same-day surgery with axillary dissection

Huang

Wang

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background It is well known that postoperative exercise was good for the life quality of breast cancer patients. But it is important to design a exercise with flexibility and mobility for breast cancer survivors. Here we provide an effective postoperative rehabilitation strategy for breast cancer patients with desirable efficacy. Methods In this retrospective study, breast cancer patients between 2018.01 and 2022.08 were enrolled. Based on the different rehabilitation methods, patients were separated into control group (2018.01-2020.12) or intervention group (2021.01-2022.08). The patients in the control group were mainly told by oral education to move their upper limbs step by step according to the actual situation. The patients in the intervention group were fully informed of the timing, location, and precautions for postoperative rehabilitation exercise through oral education, video data, one-on-one guidance in combination with rehabilitation exercise equipment. The assessments include postoperative rest, diet and defecation, upper extremity edema and function, postoperative drainage volume, pain, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Results Finally, 838 participants were enrolled, including 337 cases in control group and 501 cases in intervention group. Three days after the operation, and the sleep status of the intervention group was significantly better than that of the control group. Compared with the control group, the axillary and chest wall drainage volumes in the intervention group were significantly reduced 3 days and 2 weeks after operation. Meanwhile, the extubation rates between two groups was statistically significant. There was a significant statistical difference in the mean pain scores between the two groups at postoperative day 3 (0.78 ± 0.84 vs 0.69 ± 0.73, P = 0.03) and postoperative two weeks (0.46 ± 0.69 vs 0.38 ± 0.54, P<0.001). The wound healing rate was 90.8% vs 94.5% with statistically significance. Two weeks after surgery (3.6% vs 1.4%, P = 0.04) and 1 month after surgery (2.4% vs 0.6%, P = 0.03 ), the rate of upper limb edema in the intervention group was significantly reduced. In addition, the mobility of the affected limbs of patients in the intervention group was better than that in the control group. Postoperative ROM in convention group was better than control group. The height of the finger wall were relatively larger. DASH score of two groups were 22.50 ± 2.71 and 46.72 ± 3.11, P = 0.03. The anxiety level of patients in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group 3 days after operation and 6 months after surgery. For depression analysis, the proportion of patients with different degrees of depression in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 3 days after operation. Finally, significant improvement in the cognitive function, emotional function and physical function was found in intervention group 6 months after surgery. Conclusions Progressive physical exercises combined with equipment-assisted training had positive effects on improving postoperative rehabilitation, physical functioning, shoulder ROM, and decreasing patients' anxiety and depression symptoms, consequently enhancing the quality of life.

show abstract

Section: 9quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 82%

Effects of progressive physical exercises combined with equipment-assisted training on postoperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients underwent same-day surgery with axillary dissection

Huang

Wang

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The included RCTs examined the effects of different exercise interventions: 20 (800 participants) examined the effects of AE, 19,22,37–54 eight (280 participants) examined the effects of RT, 49,50,55–60 17 (539 participants) examined the effects of MB, 19,42,60–74 and 18 (520 participants) examined the effects of CE 18,40,49,75–89 . Of these RCTs, 53 compared the effects of exercise interventions with control groups, three compared the effects of two different exercise interventions, three used a three‐arm design, and one used a four‐arm design.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of exercise interventions on quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Han,

Zhang,

Zhao

et al. 2024

Psycho-Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo compare and rank the effectiveness of four primary categories of exercise modalities (aerobic, resistance, mind‐body, and combined exercise [CE]) in improving the Quality of life (QoL) of women with breast cancer in a network meta‐analysis (NMA).MethodsArticles published in English and indexed in the PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases were identified from inception to 12 October 2023. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were assessed for risk of bias. A frequentist NMA was conducted to appraise the efficacy of different exercise types.ResultsThis study included 56 studies with 3904 participants. Aerobic, mind‐body, and combined exercises effectively improved QoL compared to controls. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that CE best improved patients' QoL (SUCRA = 96.7%). Analysis of the secondary outcomes suggests that exercise reduced patients' depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.70 to −0.06, p < 0.001; I2 = 79%) and anxiety (SMD = −0.50, 95% CI = −0.69 to −0.31, p < 0.001; I2 = 27.4%) but did not affect self‐esteem.ConclusionAll exercise types but resistance were effective in improving the QoL of women with breast cancer, CE (the combination of aerobic and resistance exercise) had the highest likelihood of being optimal for improving QoL.

show abstract

Effects of concurrent aerobic and strength training in women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Han,

Duan,

Zhang

et al. 2024

J Cancer Surviv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motor Exercises Effect on Improving Shoulders Functioning, Functional Ability, Quality of Life, Depression and Anxiety For Women With Breast Cancer

Cited by 6 publications

References 34 publications

Effects of progressive physical exercises combined with equipment-assisted training on postoperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients underwent same-day surgery with axillary dissection

Effects of progressive physical exercises combined with equipment-assisted training on postoperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients underwent same-day surgery with axillary dissection

Effects of exercise interventions on quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Effects of concurrent aerobic and strength training in women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About