Motives and Barriers Related to Physical Activity within Different Types of Built Environments: Implications for Health Promotion

Abstract

Studies have identified individuals’ motives and barriers as main predictors of physical-activity behaviour, while other studies found physical-activity behaviour to be related to characteristics of the built environment. However, studies that have a combined focus on motives and barriers and the built environment are less common. This scoping review aims to provide knowledge about motives and barriers related to physical activity within different types of built environments to mitigate this knowledge gap. A systematic literature search was performed in four scientific databases and yielded 2734 articles, of which 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. The review identified four types of built environments within which motives and barriers were studied, including walkability, cyclist infrastructure, neighbourhood parks and open spaces and sports facilities. Several common motives recur across all four types of built environments, especially easy accessibility and good facility conditions. Conversely, poor accessibility and inadequate facility conditions are common barriers. Our review also showed how some motives and barriers seem to be more context-specific because they were only identified within a few types of built environments. This knowledge may help target future health-promotion initiatives in relation to urban planning and the importance of the environment on physical activity.

Profiling Physical Fitness of Physical Education Majors Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

“…Complementary, there is a significant association between a low physical fitness and a poor academic performance [45]; therefore, it becomes important to promote physical and recreational activities during university life. In fact, pre-established university activities, facilities, and the accurate identification of students at a higher risk are important factors that might positively impact the physical fitness level, quality of life, and academic performance of major students [46]. Here, we presented a methodological and analytical workflow to profile exercise and sports major students using unsupervised machine learning.…”

Social Environment Related to Opportunities for Physical Activity within Different types of Built Environments: A Scoping Review

“…The built environment may in uence overall community health and individual behaviours such as physical activity and healthy eating' [4]. This de nition encompasses elements most pertinent to behaviours related to physical activity, including community design, public transport, built environment for active transportation (walking and biking), pedestrian safety, and other types of built environments in the local area, such as green areas, parks, open spaces, aesthetics and pleasantness, recreational facilities, and sports facilities [22]. Inspired by the categorisation of McCormack and Shiell [20], we divided the results of this study into four types of built environment: walkability, cyclist infrastructure, neighbourhood parks, open spaces, and sports facilities.…”

Campus outdoor environment, learning engagement, and the mental health of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: From the perspective of students in different grades

“…For instance, open spaces, athletic fields, and exercise amenities proffer college students convivial and reposeful domains for socializing and unwinding (45). The accessibility of green areas in outdoor scenes, the availability of facility structures, the existence and esthetics of sidewalks, and the multiplicity of physical facilities are positively correlated with participation in sports activities (46)(47)(48). Those who partake in more esthetically pleasing outdoor activities are more prone to attaining positive psychological dispositions and sound mental wellbeing (49).…”