2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational interviewing quality assurance: A systematic review of assessment tools across research contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, group size difference was not due to systematic error, and we considered this factor unlikely to have distorted the outcomes. Additionally, we could not perform a structured fidelity assessment of audio recordings 69 because of limited consent from patients and legal guardians for both MI and TAU consultations. We cannot rule out that TAU pediatricians intuitively used some patient-centered conversation techniques.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, group size difference was not due to systematic error, and we considered this factor unlikely to have distorted the outcomes. Additionally, we could not perform a structured fidelity assessment of audio recordings 69 because of limited consent from patients and legal guardians for both MI and TAU consultations. We cannot rule out that TAU pediatricians intuitively used some patient-centered conversation techniques.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies would do well to ensure that counselors attend at least four supervision sessions after their initial training and are provided with ongoing feedback, which seems to be especially important in learning MI ( 46 ). There are several validated proficiency measures for MI ( 40 ), and tools are already being developed to automatically measure treatment fidelity ( 54 , 55 ). Such tools are especially interesting in relation to chat-based helplines, which could use them to provide counselors with rapid feedback on every chat they conduct, perhaps even while it is ongoing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five indices of treatment integrity can be extracted from the MI-SCOPE: the percentage of MI-consistent responses, the percentage of open questions, the percentage of complex reflections, the reflection-to-question ratio and the proportion of change talk. A review by Hurlocker et al ( 40 ) showed that reliability estimates for the MI-SCOPE are generally fair to excellent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges related to navigating ongoing agency compliance needs, organizational culture shifts, and the quest for continuous quality improvement through program implementation are not unique to VR, but are increasingly relevant, as awareness to adopt evidence-based strategies in our programs develops (Durlak, 2015;Lockett et al, 2018;Nilsen, 2015). A growing body of evidence suggests that development of a framework and consistent use of related tools are key in supporting the advancement of QA efforts within disciplines, including VR (Green et al, 2019;Hurlocker et al, 2020;Lockett et al, 2018).…”
Section: Background and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%