Motivational interviewing interventions aiming to improve health behaviors among cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review

Seven, Memnun; Reid, Allecia E.; Abban, Sabriye; Madziar, Camilla; Faro, Jamie M

doi:10.1007/s11764-022-01253-5

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a more significant effect was observed at 3month follow-up. This may be because monthly motivational interviews help patients adopt positive health behaviors and improve their self-management awareness [42] . Moreover, current online selfmanagement information on LARS is overly intricate for patients, and the information fails to meet the patient's needs [43] .…”

Section: Principal Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of a Mobile Health–Based Remote Interaction Management Intervention on the Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial

Zhou,

Li,

Pang

et al. 2024

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: People who undergo sphincter-preserving surgery have high rates of anorectal functional disturbances, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). LARS negatively affects patients' quality of life (QoL) and increases their need for self-management behaviors. A high level of self-management behavior effectively improved the impact of LARS on patients. Therefore, approaches to enhance self-management behavior and QoL are vital.Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a remote interactive management intervention designed to enhance the QoL and self-management behavior of patients with LARS.Methods: From July 2022 to May 2023, we conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) and recruited 120 patients with LARS in a tertiary hospital in Hefei, China. All participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (using the 'e-bowel safety' applet and monthly Motivational interviewing) or the control group (usual care and an information booklet). Our team provided a 3-month intervention and followed up with all participants for an additional 3 months. The primary outcome was patient QoL measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30). The secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Bowel Symptoms Selfmanagement Behaviors Questionnaire (BSSBQ), LARS Score, and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS). Data collection occurred at study enrollment, the end of the three-month intervention, and the three-month follow-up. Results:In the end, 111 participants completed the study. In the intervention group, 5 participants withdrew; 4 participants withdrew in the control group. Compared with the participants in the control group, those in the intervention group had significantly larger improvements in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 total score (mean difference 11.51, 95% CI 10.68-12.35, Cohen's d=1.73) and BSSBQ total score (mean difference 8.80, 95% CI 8.28-9.32, Cohen's d=1.94) after intervention, and this improvement effect remained stable at 3-month follow-up (mean difference 14.47, 95% CI 13.65-15.30, Cohen's d=1.58), (mean difference 8.85, 95% CI 8. Cohen's d=2.23). The LARS Score total score had significantly larger decreases after intervention (mean difference -3.28, 95% CI -4.03 to -2.54, Cohen's d=-0.39) and at 3-month follow-up (mean difference -6.69, 95% CI -7.45 to -5.93, Cohen's d=-0.69). The PSSS total score had significantly larger improvements after intervention (mean difference 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-0.71, Cohen's d=1.81); however, this effect did not persist at 3-month follow-up (mean difference 0.23, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.45; P=0.074).

show abstract

Section: Principal Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of a Mobile Health–Based Remote Interaction Management Intervention on the Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial

Zhou,

Li,

Pang

et al. 2024

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Communication and support of patients and caregivers in chronic cancer care: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline

Stiefel,

Bourquin,

Salmon

et al. 2024

ESMO Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study protocol for two pilot randomised controlled trials aimed at increasing physical activity using electrically assisted bicycles to enhance prostate or breast cancer survival

Bourne

Foster

Forte

et al. 2023

Pilot Feasibility Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In 2020, 1.4 and 2.3 million new cases of prostate cancer and breast cancer respectively were diagnosed globally. In the UK, prostate cancer is the most common male cancer, while breast cancer is the most common female cancer. Engaging in physical activity (PA) is a key component of treatment. However, rates of PA are low in these clinical populations. This paper describes the protocol of CRANK-P and CRANK-B, two pilot randomised controlled trials, involving an e-cycling intervention aimed at increasing PA in individuals with prostate cancer or breast cancer respectively. Methods These two trials are single-centre, stratified, parallel-group, two-arm randomised waitlist-controlled pilot trials in which forty individuals with prostate cancer (CRANK-P) and forty individuals with breast cancer (CRANK-B) will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to an e-cycling intervention or waitlist control. The intervention consists of e-bike training with a certified cycle instructor, followed by the provision of an e-bike for 12 weeks. Following the intervention period, participants in the e-bike condition will be directed to community-based initiatives through which they can access an e-bike. Data will be collected at baseline (T0), immediately post intervention (T1) and at 3-month follow-up (T2). In addition, in the intervention group, data will be collected during the intervention and follow-up periods. Quantitative and qualitative methods will be used. The primary objectives are to determine effective recruitment strategies, establish recruitment and consent rates, adherence and retention in the study, and determine the feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures and intervention. The potential impact of the intervention on clinical, physiological and behavioural outcomes will be assessed to examine intervention promise. Data analyses will be descriptive. Discussion The findings from these trials will provide information on trial feasibility and highlight the potential of e-cycling as a strategy to positively impact the health and behaviour of individuals with prostate cancer and breast cancer. If appropriate, this information can be used to design and deliver a fully powered definitive trial. Trial registration CRANK-B: [ISRCTN39112034]. CRANK-P [ISRCTN42852156]. Registered [08/04/2022] https://www.isrctn.com.

show abstract

Motivational interviewing interventions aiming to improve health behaviors among cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review

Cited by 4 publications

References 46 publications

Effect of a Mobile Health–Based Remote Interaction Management Intervention on the Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a Mobile Health–Based Remote Interaction Management Intervention on the Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial

Communication and support of patients and caregivers in chronic cancer care: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline

Study protocol for two pilot randomised controlled trials aimed at increasing physical activity using electrically assisted bicycles to enhance prostate or breast cancer survival

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About