2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational climate interventions in physical education: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
155
2
35

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
155
2
35
Order By: Relevance
“…In a performance motivational climate instructors encourage social comparison, superficially stimulate students during learning process using on regulative evaluation and recompensing performance results (Ames, 1992;Ames & Archer, 1988;Murcia, Camacho, & Rodríguez, 2008;Keegan, Spray, Harwood, & Lavallee, 2010), and enhance thereby the competition among students complimenting the most talented students (Cervelló & Santos-Rosa, 2001;Nicholls, 1989;). Performance-related motivational climate induces feelings of anxiety, stress, confusion, boredom and withdrawal, as it prevails lack of motivation (Liukkonen, Barkoukis, Watt, & Jaakkola, 2010;Braithwaite, Spray, & Warburton, 2011;Cumming, Smoll, Smith, & Grossbard, 2007;Nerstad, Roberts, & Richardsen, 2013;Van De Pol et al, 2012;Granero-Gallegos et al, 2014;Ommundsen & KvalØ, 2007). Research has identified further behaviors and interactions that contribute to motivational climate, such as the influence between peers, based on promoting cooperation, support, affection, competition, disagreement and friendships (Vazou, Ntoumanis, & Duda, 2005;Keegan, Spray, Harwood, & Lavallee, 2009;Keegan, Spray, Harwood, & Lavallee, 2010;Beltman & Volet, 2007;Bengoechea & Strean, 2007;Weiss, Amorose, & Wilko, 2009).…”
Section: Motivational Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a performance motivational climate instructors encourage social comparison, superficially stimulate students during learning process using on regulative evaluation and recompensing performance results (Ames, 1992;Ames & Archer, 1988;Murcia, Camacho, & Rodríguez, 2008;Keegan, Spray, Harwood, & Lavallee, 2010), and enhance thereby the competition among students complimenting the most talented students (Cervelló & Santos-Rosa, 2001;Nicholls, 1989;). Performance-related motivational climate induces feelings of anxiety, stress, confusion, boredom and withdrawal, as it prevails lack of motivation (Liukkonen, Barkoukis, Watt, & Jaakkola, 2010;Braithwaite, Spray, & Warburton, 2011;Cumming, Smoll, Smith, & Grossbard, 2007;Nerstad, Roberts, & Richardsen, 2013;Van De Pol et al, 2012;Granero-Gallegos et al, 2014;Ommundsen & KvalØ, 2007). Research has identified further behaviors and interactions that contribute to motivational climate, such as the influence between peers, based on promoting cooperation, support, affection, competition, disagreement and friendships (Vazou, Ntoumanis, & Duda, 2005;Keegan, Spray, Harwood, & Lavallee, 2009;Keegan, Spray, Harwood, & Lavallee, 2010;Beltman & Volet, 2007;Bengoechea & Strean, 2007;Weiss, Amorose, & Wilko, 2009).…”
Section: Motivational Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this theory, different environmental factors that direct individuals to construct competence have been studied under the term "motivational climate". Parents, peers and, specially, coaches have been researched as key agents in the construction of motivational climates based on the way they relate to sport and athletes 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They promote mastery-oriented individuals that try hard even when facing difficulties, show intrinsic interest in the different tasks, and persist over time 6 . Finally, they have been linked with confidence and enjoyment in physical activity settings 4 . In performance climates, success and failure are defined in normative terms, with an emphasis on outperforming teammates and opponents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De la observación se destaca a continuación las frecuencias más características de aparición de cada categoría que perfilarán las condiciones del entorno de aprendizaje de los estudiantes participantes en este estudio (Braithwaite, Spray, & Warburton, 2011). Atendiendo de forma específica al criterio autodeterminación, se puede apreciar cómo en todas las sesiones analizadas hay presencia de eventos referentes a cada una de sus categorías, destacando aquellas en las que el profesor apoya preferentemente las relaciones con los demás (41%).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified