Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101) 2000
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2000.899225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion-JPEG2000 standardization and target market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…method, etc. Part III will define motion JPEG 2000 (MJP2) and will be based on Part I of JPEG 2000 [21]. MJP2 will be used in many different areas, as for example in applications where it is desired to have a single codec for both still pictures and motion sequences (which is a common feature of digital still cameras), or in applications where very high quality motion pictures are required (e.g., medical imaging and motion picture production), or in video applications in error prone environments (e.g., wireless and the Internet).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…method, etc. Part III will define motion JPEG 2000 (MJP2) and will be based on Part I of JPEG 2000 [21]. MJP2 will be used in many different areas, as for example in applications where it is desired to have a single codec for both still pictures and motion sequences (which is a common feature of digital still cameras), or in applications where very high quality motion pictures are required (e.g., medical imaging and motion picture production), or in video applications in error prone environments (e.g., wireless and the Internet).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After decorrelating the data using an RGB to YCbCr transform and then applying the lifting transform, the HL, LH, and HH sub bands of the chrominance component's lifting decomposition are discarded and all other subbands retained. This has the effect of achieving a 2:1 subsampling in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the chrominance components [8].…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of compression efficiency, other video compression standards outperform MJPEG2000 due to the use of motion-compensated prediction between frames. However, MJPEG2000 encodes each frame independent of others and therefore offers superior performance when considering video editing and error robustness [12]. In addition, MJPEG2000 makes use of the wavelet transform which adds the advantage of a lower computational complexity than the calculation and manipulation of motion vectors used in MPEG video compression [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%