2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23623-5_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion Correction and Parameter Estimation in dceMRI Sequences: Application to Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Abstract. We present a novel Bayesian framework for non-rigid motion correction and pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dceMRI sequences which incorporates a physiological image formation model into the similarity measure used for motion correction. The similarity measure is based on the maximization of the joint posterior probability of the transformations which need to be applied to each image in the dataset to bring all images into alignment, and the physiological parameters which best explain the data.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayesian inference for nonlinear model algorithms have been proposed before in the literature [10,11,12] to estimate unbiased quantitative tracer kinetic parameters. The proposed scheme is similar to the one suggested by Schmid et al [10], the main difference is on the estimation of the onset time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bayesian inference for nonlinear model algorithms have been proposed before in the literature [10,11,12] to estimate unbiased quantitative tracer kinetic parameters. The proposed scheme is similar to the one suggested by Schmid et al [10], the main difference is on the estimation of the onset time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian algorithms can model the noise of the measured concentration of the contrast agent and have a theoretical guarantee to converge if run long enough [13]. This work suggests a Bayesian inference for nonlinear model algorithm similar to the ones proposed by other groups [10,11,12] and evaluates its robustness and diagnostic value against the LevenbergMarquardt and the simplex algorithms on two separate cohorts of patients: i) a cohort of 76 men, 20 of whom had significant prostate cancer in the peripheral zone ii) a cohort of 9 healthy volunteers and 24 patients with squamous cell carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard choices such as mutual information are not effective in DCE-CT sequences [5]. In [6], Bhushan et al used the pharmacokinetic model fitting error as registration criterion for DCE-MR, thus coupling the two tasks of sequence stabilisation and parameter estimation. However, the latter is a highly non-convex problem: including additional unknowns (namely the pharmacokinetic parameters) increases the risk of falling in local minima.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%