2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00350-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mothers’ influence on the timing of first sex among 14- and 15-year-olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
120
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
120
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the weakening of parental influences and the fact that romantic involvement and sexual experiences are normative parts of middle and late adolescent development could explain the decreasing links with age. The stronger link between parent-child relations and age of first sexual intercourse in females, as compared to males, was also found in earlier studies (Davis and Friel, 2001;De Graaf et al 2011;McNeely et al 2002;Rose et al 2005). This finding can be explained by the theory of female erotic plasticity (Baumeister 2000), which states that female sexuality is more susceptible to social influences than male sexuality, whereas male sexuality is more directly tied to biological factors.…”
Section: Family Cohesion and The Timing Of Romantic And Sexual Initiasupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the weakening of parental influences and the fact that romantic involvement and sexual experiences are normative parts of middle and late adolescent development could explain the decreasing links with age. The stronger link between parent-child relations and age of first sexual intercourse in females, as compared to males, was also found in earlier studies (Davis and Friel, 2001;De Graaf et al 2011;McNeely et al 2002;Rose et al 2005). This finding can be explained by the theory of female erotic plasticity (Baumeister 2000), which states that female sexuality is more susceptible to social influences than male sexuality, whereas male sexuality is more directly tied to biological factors.…”
Section: Family Cohesion and The Timing Of Romantic And Sexual Initiasupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In addition, females generally appear to be more affected by relationships than boys (Rose and Rudolph 2006). Previous research already showed that parental influences on sexual behavior tend to be stronger for girls, compared to boys (Davis and Friel 2001;De Graaf et al 2011;McNeely et al 2002;Rose et al 2005). We therefore expect to find stronger links between family cohesion on the one hand and romantic and sexual initiation on the other hand for females than for males.…”
Section: Goals and Hypotheses Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Past research indicates that male parents/ guardians are less likely than female parents/ guardians to be involved in the sexual health education of their youth (Dyson & Smith, 2012;McNeely et al, 2002). Yet, our study does not support a gender disparity, as fathers or male guardians made up just over one third of our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also tested gender-interaction effects (ie, gender × mother-adolescent relationships, gender × fatheradolescent relationships), to assess whether the found effects from the stratified analyses were indeed really statistically different for boys and girls. All regression models included the following potential confounders: gender, 39 age, 39 educational level, 19, ethnic background, 42 family structure, 42 -44 and parental monitoring. 45 -47 A significance level of P < .05 was used to indicate significant effects.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%