2014
DOI: 10.3945/jn.113.189738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Most Blood Biomarkers Related to Vitamin Status, One-Carbon Metabolism, and the Kynurenine Pathway Show Adequate Preanalytical Stability and Within-Person Reproducibility to Allow Assessment of Exposure or Nutritional Status in Healthy Women and Cardiovascular Patients

Abstract: Knowledge of stability during sample transportation and changes in biomarker concentrations within person over time are paramount for proper design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies based on a single measurement of biomarker status. Therefore, we investigated stability and intraindividual vs. interindividual variation in blood concentrations of biomarkers related to vitamin status, one-carbon metabolism, and the kynurenine pathway. Whole blood (EDTA and heparin, n = 12) was stored with an icepack for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
84
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
84
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the risk estimates in NORVIT were in general similar to those observed in HUSK and WECAC, making it less likely that the choline and betaine AF risk associations in NORVIT merely reflected persistent or recurrent AF present at baseline. Moreover, the within‐person reproducibility for neither plasma betaine nor choline is excellent 44, 49. Therefore, the risk associations explored based on baseline samples may be underestimated due to regression dilution bias 50…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the risk estimates in NORVIT were in general similar to those observed in HUSK and WECAC, making it less likely that the choline and betaine AF risk associations in NORVIT merely reflected persistent or recurrent AF present at baseline. Moreover, the within‐person reproducibility for neither plasma betaine nor choline is excellent 44, 49. Therefore, the risk associations explored based on baseline samples may be underestimated due to regression dilution bias 50…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the current study is based on the measurement of blood parameters at only 1 time point, thus preventing assessment of the possible variation of cystathionine during follow‐up. However, the within‐subject reproducibility has been shown to be fair to good for plasma cystathionine,26 which allows 1‐exposure assessment of plasma cystathionine status, with reduced risk of regression dilution bias. Third, we performed multiple subgroup comparisons, and it is possible that the significant interaction between cystathionine and previous atrial fibrillation on stroke occurrence is attributed to chance (type I error).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 the main weakness of the study was that only a single baseline blood sample from each participant was analyzed, preventing assessment of longitudinal variability in metabolite status. However, we have previously observed a fair to good withinsubject reproducibility over time for betaine, dimethylglycine, and sarcosine, 42 which minimizes the risk of regression dilution bias for these biomarkers. in contrast, reproducibility is poor for choline and methionine, 42 which may suggest that our findings for choline and methionine could be underestimations of the "true" associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have previously observed a fair to good withinsubject reproducibility over time for betaine, dimethylglycine, and sarcosine, 42 which minimizes the risk of regression dilution bias for these biomarkers. in contrast, reproducibility is poor for choline and methionine, 42 which may suggest that our findings for choline and methionine could be underestimations of the "true" associations. another potential drawback of this study and other similar studies in which associations between candidate risk factors and colorectal cancer are sequentially tested in univariate models is that more complex interactions and joint effects of the studied genetic and environmental factors may not be discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%