1964
DOI: 10.2307/3772882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mossi Joking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two types of relations coexist and complement each other. Joking relations compensate for the more rigid respect relations and constitute a socially approved strategy for coping with conflicts inherent in the latter and for defusing tensions (Canut and Smith ; Hammond ). Likewise, Alma Gottlieb's () analysis of Beng (Ivory Coast) matri‐ and patriclans shows some similarity between these groupings and badenya and fadenya: The matriclan is associated with “identity/sameness” and the patriclan with “difference.” Gottlieb shows how they overlap in a complex way, sometimes opposed, sometimes complementary, each sharing characteristics of the other…”
Section: Sibling Relations: Badenyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two types of relations coexist and complement each other. Joking relations compensate for the more rigid respect relations and constitute a socially approved strategy for coping with conflicts inherent in the latter and for defusing tensions (Canut and Smith ; Hammond ). Likewise, Alma Gottlieb's () analysis of Beng (Ivory Coast) matri‐ and patriclans shows some similarity between these groupings and badenya and fadenya: The matriclan is associated with “identity/sameness” and the patriclan with “difference.” Gottlieb shows how they overlap in a complex way, sometimes opposed, sometimes complementary, each sharing characteristics of the other…”
Section: Sibling Relations: Badenyamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most anthropological writings on the subject of joking owe their impetus and direction to the classic articles of Radcliffe-Brown (1940, 1949. Even researchers who have been critical of the arguments presented in these articles, with few exceptions (Miller 1967;Douglas 1968), have conducted their analysis along the lines originally suggested by him (Hammond 1964;Sykes 1966;Sharman 1969;Lundberg 1969;Loudon 1970;Coser 1959;Bradney 1957). We refer to Radcliffe-Brown not so much to criticize and expand upon his ideas, but to distinguish our approach from his and to indicate the main direction of our analysis.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%