1972
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forms of Joking Activity: A Comparative Approach1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Mary Douglas, anthropologists did not debate the joke itself, while joking as one form of expression is yet to be interpreted in its over-all relationship to other forms of communication (Douglas 1968: 361). Nonetheless, some anthropologists have provided detailed information on the verbal and physical manifestations of joking in certain social contexts which are quite similar to the šala in the Serbian context, emphasizing thereby the behavioral aspect of these activities (see Handelman et al 1972).…”
Section: What Is Humor Actually?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Mary Douglas, anthropologists did not debate the joke itself, while joking as one form of expression is yet to be interpreted in its over-all relationship to other forms of communication (Douglas 1968: 361). Nonetheless, some anthropologists have provided detailed information on the verbal and physical manifestations of joking in certain social contexts which are quite similar to the šala in the Serbian context, emphasizing thereby the behavioral aspect of these activities (see Handelman et al 1972).…”
Section: What Is Humor Actually?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropologists have often found it helpful to deconstruct jokes and humour through their multiple frames (Handelman & Kapferer 1972;Beeman 2001). Beeman (2001) examines the operationalization of incongruity at a linguistic level.…”
Section: Redefining Rationalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teasing has been examined within adult conversations (Alberts, 1992;Drew, 1987;Haugh, 2010;Spielmann, 1998;Straehle, 1993), amongst children within primary schools (Lytra, 2007;Thorne, 1993;Voss, 1997) and high schools (Hoover et al, 1992;Moore, 1992), within child-directed speech (Demuth, 1986;Haviland, 1986;Miller, 1986;Schieffelin, 1986), within fraternity and sorority houses (Keltner et al, 1998;Lyman, 1987), within the workplace (Geyer, 2010;Handelman and Kapferer, 1972;Pizzini, 1991;Schnurr, 2009), within multicultural/multiethnic settings (Lytra, 2007(Lytra, , 2010, and with autistic children (Heerey et al, 2005). Most researchers recognise important pro-social functions of teasing such as affiliation, rapport building and various socialization practices springing from teasers' highlighting deviant behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%