1987
DOI: 10.1067/mva.1987.avs0050566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality and limb loss with infected infrainguinal bypass grafts

Abstract: A recent experience with infrainguinal graft infections was reviewed in an effort to identify factors related to limb loss and mortality. The records of 32 patients who had operative treatment of 33 episodes of infrainguinal graft infection between 1978 and 1985 were reviewed to evaluate the effects of 20 factors possibly affecting outcome. The amputation rate was 79%. Of the 20 factors studied, only the presence of overt limb sepsis was associated with the need for amputation, with 100% of patients having lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When these events unfold, they are associated with death rates of 30% to 50% and limb loss in approximately one third to one half of survivors. [1][2][3][4] The epidemiology of vascular prosthetic infections supports the hypothesis that implant infections occur because of contamination of the prosthesis with small numbers of bacteria that find the prosthetic surface favorable for survival. 5,6 The recognition of matrix proteins that coat implant surfaces by bacterial adhesion receptors 7 structure of these surfaces, which may provide bacteria with niches in which to hide; and the fact that material-adherent bacteria become encapsulated in a secreted glycocalyx 8,9 all contribute to enhanced bacterial survival in the prosthetic graft milieu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When these events unfold, they are associated with death rates of 30% to 50% and limb loss in approximately one third to one half of survivors. [1][2][3][4] The epidemiology of vascular prosthetic infections supports the hypothesis that implant infections occur because of contamination of the prosthesis with small numbers of bacteria that find the prosthetic surface favorable for survival. 5,6 The recognition of matrix proteins that coat implant surfaces by bacterial adhesion receptors 7 structure of these surfaces, which may provide bacteria with niches in which to hide; and the fact that material-adherent bacteria become encapsulated in a secreted glycocalyx 8,9 all contribute to enhanced bacterial survival in the prosthetic graft milieu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For transmission electron microscopy, neutrophils were fixed in Trump McDowell fixative containing 3.7% formaldehyde and 10% glutaraldehyde in a phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) and postfixed in 1% OsO 4 . After dehydration, the samples were preinfiltrated with acetone, infiltrated with Spurr's epoxy, and embedded.…”
Section: Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mortality rate associated with a PVGI after aortoiliac reconstruction has been reported to range from 25% to 88%, and the amputation rate may be as high as 80% after an infrainguinal vascular reconstruction. 4,5 The factors predisposing to PVGI may include the type of surgery and approach, the presence of ulcers or gangrene, and the graft material used. 1 The incidence of PVGI is estimated to be 0.5%-6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 In cases involving systemic infection, bypass removal is mandatory, often in association with amputation or bypass using a different pathway and anastomotic sites. 4,6 In cases involving localized infection of the distal anastomosis, the same solutions may be adopted but other options are available, including rerouting the bypass to another patent artery and conservative treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%