2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality among amphetamine users: A systematic review of cohort studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, those earlier reviews did not examine the potential impact of study-level variables, variation across countries, or of participant-level variables that could affect both mortality rates and differences in causes of death, yet study-level evidence suggests that males who inject drugs may be at higher risk of dying than females and that different types of drugs are associated with different risks of death. [3][4][5] Findings from other reviews have also suggested that rates of death among people who are dependent on opioids are different from the rates of death observed in people who are dependent on stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine type stimulants. [3][4][5] In recent years the number of studies reporting on mortality among people who inject drugs has increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, those earlier reviews did not examine the potential impact of study-level variables, variation across countries, or of participant-level variables that could affect both mortality rates and differences in causes of death, yet study-level evidence suggests that males who inject drugs may be at higher risk of dying than females and that different types of drugs are associated with different risks of death. [3][4][5] Findings from other reviews have also suggested that rates of death among people who are dependent on opioids are different from the rates of death observed in people who are dependent on stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine type stimulants. [3][4][5] In recent years the number of studies reporting on mortality among people who inject drugs has increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Findings from other reviews have also suggested that rates of death among people who are dependent on opioids are different from the rates of death observed in people who are dependent on stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine type stimulants. [3][4][5] In recent years the number of studies reporting on mortality among people who inject drugs has increased. Hence, the objective of this review was to determine the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…already using illegal drugs). Epidemic models of this kind generally imply the existence of a 'tipping point' known as the epidemic threshold [5]. Once the supply of 'susceptibles' falls below the epidemic threshold, the size of the 'infected' (i.e.…”
Section: We Know Too Little About Demand: Comments On 'Cocaine's Fall'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocaine, and particularly crack cocaine, is no doubt more harmful to the individual and society than marijuana [2]. While some have argued that the scientific basis for such rankings are incomplete, objectively speaking, standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for heroin (SMR = 15), cocaine and methamphetamines (SMR = 4 to 8) are exceptionally high [3][4][5], whereas marijuana is not associated with an elevated risk of mortality [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used data sources from recent and methodologically comparable systematic reviews of the association between suicide and mental and substance use disorders (83,(194)(195)(196), specifically affective disorders, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia (14 studies from these 3 disorder groups) (83), cocaine, opioid, and amphetamine dependence (24 studies) (194,195), s and alcohol dependence (12 studies) (196). We expanded the Li and collaborators systematic review and replicated the literature search (83) to collect data for bipolar disorder and MDD separately (rather than affective disorders combined), and anorexia nervosa which was not included in the original review.…”
Section: Literature Search To Identify Relative-risk Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%