2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometry of micrite particles in cretaceous microporous limestones of the Middle East: Influence on reservoir properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fabricius 2003;Fabricius and Borre 2007). Similarly, a decrease of about 30% microporosity (from about 35% in the initial micritic sediment) is attributed to pressure-solution processes in clay-rich micritic shallow carbonate lithologies (petrophysical class D) in contrast to a decrease of about 15 or 20% in ''micritic carbonates'' of classes C and F respectively, linked to early diagenetic processes documented in Middle Eastern carbonates (Deville de Periere et al 2011). Also, Moshier (1989) showed that zones of intense stylolitization are often linked to decreased microporosity in Lower Cretaceous micritic limestones in the Middle East.…”
Section: J S Rmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fabricius 2003;Fabricius and Borre 2007). Similarly, a decrease of about 30% microporosity (from about 35% in the initial micritic sediment) is attributed to pressure-solution processes in clay-rich micritic shallow carbonate lithologies (petrophysical class D) in contrast to a decrease of about 15 or 20% in ''micritic carbonates'' of classes C and F respectively, linked to early diagenetic processes documented in Middle Eastern carbonates (Deville de Periere et al 2011). Also, Moshier (1989) showed that zones of intense stylolitization are often linked to decreased microporosity in Lower Cretaceous micritic limestones in the Middle East.…”
Section: J S Rmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both carbonate samples display a matrix of micrite (abbreviation for microcrystalline calcite) with a typical grain size of 1-4 µm (Moshier, 1989), but the texture of these micrites is different between the two samples. Following the classification of micrite microtexture proposed by Lambert et al (2006) and Deville de Periere et al (2011), the micrite in sample Carb-A is mainly a "tight micrite", spatially varying from anhedral compact to fused, with grains typically 1-2 µm in diameter; micrite in sample Carb-B is a "porous micrite", varying from rounded to subrounded, with anhedral to subhedral, rounded grains, typically 2-4 µm in diameter. Besides a micrite matrix, sample Carb-A exhibits vuggy-like pores either rounded, up to about 60 µm, or more elongated, up to 300 µm in length.…”
Section: Carbonate Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8A). According to the classification of Deville de Periere et al (2011), these micrite crystals are rounded, anhedral to subhedral with punctic to partially coalescent contacts. In contrast, several millimeters from telogenetic tension gashes, larger (3 to 4 mm) euhedral crystals are associated with smaller rounded ones (Fig.…”
Section: Hpfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Steinen (1978) argued that aggradation of micrites is efficient mainly during burial, Richard et al (2007) interpreted the microporosity of the late Barremian and middle Aptian Urgonian Limestone of the Jura and Bas Dauphiné platform as the result of preservation of initial porosity and inhibition of mesogenetic compaction due to aggradational processes and Ostwald ripening in the meteoric phreatic lens during late eogenesis. Several authors have proposed that early meteoric diagenesis below surfaces of subaerial exposure is the main factor controlling the appearance of porous micrites on a shallow carbonate platform (Deville de Periere et al 2011;Volery et al 2010). However, such a scenario is difficult to consider for microporous muds deposited in deep offshore environments such as the Cenomanian and Maastrichtian ''Scaglia'' limestones of southeast Italy (Hairabian et al 2013) or the Late Cretaceous carbonate turbidites of the Mid-Pacific Mountains (Ferry and Schaaf 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%