2016
DOI: 10.5194/se-7-1185-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital carbonate rock physics

Abstract: Abstract. Modern estimation of rock properties combines imaging with advanced numerical simulations, an approach known as digital rock physics (DRP). In this paper we suggest a specific segmentation procedure of X-ray microcomputed tomography data with two different resolutions in the µm range for two sets of carbonate rock samples. These carbonates were already characterized in detail in a previous laboratory study which we complement with nanoindentation experiments (for local elastic properties). In a first… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(58 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This porosity-velocity trend is exactly the same as has been observed for a carbonate data set from a different location used in Saenger et al (2014). In their paper this trend has been observed for three different resolutions (65 nm, 1 and 4 µm).…”
Section: Elasticitysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This porosity-velocity trend is exactly the same as has been observed for a carbonate data set from a different location used in Saenger et al (2014). In their paper this trend has been observed for three different resolutions (65 nm, 1 and 4 µm).…”
Section: Elasticitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This data-driven upper bound is much stricter than the bound given by Hashin-Shtrikman (see Fig. 8) and is now confirmed for several carbonates using several resolutions (this study and Saenger et al, 2014). Only for the low-resolution images we observe a slightly different trend for P waves (Eq.…”
Section: Discussion Of Elasticity: Experiments Vs Digital Rock Physicssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical simulations can then be performed on the digital rock sample (resulting digital rock model) to quantify the available pore space, fluid transport properties (e.g. absolute permeability) and other rock properties such as elastic modulus, and the formation resistivity factor (Saenger et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the same rock sample can be examined under varying testing conditions or mineral composition, which can be virtually varied [ 48 ]. Present numerical models employ calculation techniques to determine static [ 49 , 50 , 51 ] and dynamic moduli [ 52 ] mainly for reservoir rocks such as sandstones [ 53 , 54 ] and carbonates [ 55 , 56 ], but also for shales [ 57 ]. However, there is still a discrepancy between the achieved numerical estimates of mechanical properties derived from micro-CT images and laboratory data, where, regardless of the numerical approach, the simulated moduli are systematically higher [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%