2003
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8667(2003)015<0055:mahpog>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric and Histopathological Parameters of Gonadal Development in Adult Common Carp from Contaminated and Reference Sites in Lake Mead, Nevada

Abstract: This study examined the hypothesis that exposure to sublethal concentrations of contaminants alters the gonadal condition of feral common carp Cyprinus carpio. Adult common carp in Lake Mead, Nevada, were collected from a contaminated site (Las Vegas Bay) that receives municipal and industrial effluent and from a reference site (Overton Arm) with a relatively low level of contamination. Fish were sampled seven times over a 1-year period extending over two separate spawning seasons. Morphometric and histopathol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
20
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure to identify site-associated differences among female populations could be due to their low sample size (and lower statistical power) relative to male fish. Conversely, this observation with females is consistent with results of previous studies with teleosts that have reported impairments in males, but not in females, after exposure to certain contaminants either in the laboratory (Lema et al, 2008;Muirhead et al, 2006) or in the field (Patiño et al, 2003). In adult fishes, one reason that females may be less sensitive to contaminant exposures than males may be their ability to eliminate lipophilic contaminants via eggs released during spawning (Gundersen et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The failure to identify site-associated differences among female populations could be due to their low sample size (and lower statistical power) relative to male fish. Conversely, this observation with females is consistent with results of previous studies with teleosts that have reported impairments in males, but not in females, after exposure to certain contaminants either in the laboratory (Lema et al, 2008;Muirhead et al, 2006) or in the field (Patiño et al, 2003). In adult fishes, one reason that females may be less sensitive to contaminant exposures than males may be their ability to eliminate lipophilic contaminants via eggs released during spawning (Gundersen et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Partial correlation analysis confirmed the negative relationship between GSI and testicular interstitial thickness at the individual fish level in both years. Thus, despite the usefulness of GSI and interstitial thickness as biomarkers of male fish reproductive health in some situations (Blazer, 2002;Patiño et al, 2003Patiño et al, , 2012, they must be interpreted with caution. In females, the pattern of GSI variation among sites was also inconsistent between years; mean values were lowest in Skamania in 2009 and lowest in Longview in 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reduced GSI has been reported in male fish exposed to the natural female steroidal hormones, estradiol [19], biodegradates of detergents like nonylphenol and octylphenol [20] and other alkylphenols like BPA [6]. In polluted river waters the synergestic effect of estrogenic EDCs like estradiol (E2), nonylphenol, oroctylphenol [18,20] showed a decrease in GSI of common carps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to affecting individuals at any life stage, many environmental EDCs can modify the germ line, resulting in transgenerational impacts to male fertility, as seen with vinclozin, methoxychlor (Anway et al 2005), BDE-99 (Kuriyama et al, 2005), and dioxin (Theobald and Peterson, 1997). Reproductive dysfunction in male fish due to EDC can reduce sperm numbers (Haubruge et al, 2000;Patiño et al, 2003), sperm motility (Jenkins et al, 2009;Lahnsteiner et al, 2006), and fertility (Lahnsteiner et al, 2006). Secondary sex characteristics (Angus et al, 2001;Bayley et al, 2002;Jenkins et al, 2009) and thyroid hormoneresponsive genes (Nourizadeh-Lillabadi et al, 2009) also can be influenced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%