1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0264.1999.00196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric Analysis of Collagen: a Comparative Study in Cow and Pig Skins

Abstract: Light and electron microscopic studies were conducted on dermis samples taken from different regions of adult cows and pigs to determine whether there is a correlation between subfibrillar architecture and collagen fibril diameter in dermis tissue. Dermis thicknesses, collagen fibril diameters, subfibrillar architecture diameters, and angles of the helical arrangement of subfibrillar architectures were measured in all dermis samples. The results showed that the differences between subfibrillar architecture dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFI value in the CP group was significantly higher than that in the other 2 groups, as both fibril diameter and fibril density were highest in the CP group. Biochemical analysis GAG in the dermis mainly comprised HA and DS, as reported previously ( 17 ). Although the ratio of DS was higher in the CP group, no significant differences were observed between each pair of groups.…”
Section: Morphological Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CFI value in the CP group was significantly higher than that in the other 2 groups, as both fibril diameter and fibril density were highest in the CP group. Biochemical analysis GAG in the dermis mainly comprised HA and DS, as reported previously ( 17 ). Although the ratio of DS was higher in the CP group, no significant differences were observed between each pair of groups.…”
Section: Morphological Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
“…All animal experiments in this study were approved by the Ethics Com-mittee of Rakuno Gakuen University. A litter of 9 healthy 66-d-old piglets (Landrace, Large White stock crossbreeds) were divided into three groups (3 piglets/ group) such that the average body weight did not differ among the groups (group 1: 41.7 Ϯ 14.2、 group 2: 43.5 Ϯ 9.6、 group 3: 45.7 Ϯ 3.1 kg, respectively), as no sex differences were observed in collagen fibrils in our previous study ( 17 ). Pigs were selected as experimental animals because their skin is used clinically as a skin substitute and because, like humans, they are omnivorous.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other reports give quite different values for fibril diameters in skin and tendon: 202−204 nm in diameter (ovine tendon, measured using TEM) 30 and 142−163 nm in diameter (bovine skin, measured using TEM). 43 As mentioned in the Introduction, diameters determined by TEM can vary greatly depending on the sample preparation procedures and fixation method. 31 We find that in some parts of the cross sections (not shown) of some samples, particularly the ovine leather, there is a bimodal distribution of fibril diameter.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other reports give quite different values for fibril diameters in skin and tendon: 202–204 nm in diameter (ovine tendon, measured using TEM) and 142–163 nm in diameter (bovine skin, measured using TEM) . As mentioned in the Introduction, diameters determined by TEM can vary greatly depending on the sample preparation procedures and fixation method …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characteristic was observed in innumerable species of mammals, as for example in the dog, rats or guinea pigs (Ferry, Argentieri, & Lochner, 1995;Kazanci, Kurus, & Atasever, 2017;Schwarz, Le Roux, Schaller, & Neurand, 1979;Thomas, 2005). However, it contrast with some species in which the skin is much thicker, such as in humans, goat, horses, cows or pigs (Ferry et al, 1995;Jørgensen, Lazzarini, Pirone, Jacobsen, & Miragliotta, 2018;Kobayashi et al, 1999;Moyo, Gomes, & Erlwanger, 2018;Razvi, Suri, & Sarma, 2014;Yabuki et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%