2007
DOI: 10.1163/156854007779696442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of the Pachygrapsus gracilis (De Saussure, 1858) megalopa (Brachyura, Grapsidae) reared in the laboratory

Abstract: This study describes the morphology of the megalopa stage of Pachygrapsus gracilis in detail and compares it with that of other species collected in the Camaronera Lagoon inlet of the Alvarado Lagoon system, Veracruz, Mexico. The biological material was collected with a conical net (1.0 m length, 0.75 m width, 243 µm mesh opening). Rearing was conducted in a vertical re-circulating system. We find that the numbers and types of setae to differentiate the megalopa of P. gracilis are on the following structures: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mexican specimens of P. gracilis (CHÁRAZO-OLVERA & ROCHA-RAMÍREZ 2007) are larger than the Amazonian specimens. The carapace width of specimens from the Amazon was 1.39 ± 0.04 mm and the carapace length was 1.97 ± 0.04 mm, while in Mexican specimens the carapace length and width were 2.20 ± 0.02 mm and 1.57 ± 0.04 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Mexican specimens of P. gracilis (CHÁRAZO-OLVERA & ROCHA-RAMÍREZ 2007) are larger than the Amazonian specimens. The carapace width of specimens from the Amazon was 1.39 ± 0.04 mm and the carapace length was 1.97 ± 0.04 mm, while in Mexican specimens the carapace length and width were 2.20 ± 0.02 mm and 1.57 ± 0.04 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The appendages were extracted and transferred to another slide where they were stained with a solution of methylene blue 1% (sometimes was used). The terminology used in the descriptions follows POHLE & TELFORD (1981), GUERAO et al (1997), FLORES et al (1998), GARM (2004, and CHÁRAZO-OLVERA & ROCHA RAMÍREZ (2007). The studied specimens were deposited at the crustacean collection of Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, under the catalog number MPEG-817.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%