2022
DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of the larvae and biology of the adults of Psilorrhynchus bifasciatus do not confirm previous hypotheses about systematics and feeding habits (Coleoptera: Cantharidae)

Abstract: Psilorrhynchus bifasciatus (Blanchard, 1844) is broadly distributed through South America, but its biology, behaviour and life cycle are unknown. The most characteristic feature of the adults is slender rostrum, presumably associated to a specialised feeding habit. However, new observations of P. bifasciatus feeding on nectar in inflorescences of Matayba guianensis Aubl. (Sapindaceae) do not support such a hypothesis. Here, we describe and illustrate their early larval instars in details and compare them with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cantharidae larvae are usually easily recognised by their soft body densely covered with short pubescence, giving them a velvety appearance; other characters, like the prognathous and slightly flattened head, and body with lateral and transversal ampullae with pairs of glandular pores are also diagnostic (Crowson 1972;Ramsdale 2010). They have a rich diversity of structures useful for characterising lineages of Cantharidae and have enabled the production of identification keys, the recognition of genera and groups of species, and the definition of subfamilies (cf., Bøving & Craighead 1931;Striganova 1962;Fitton 1976;Klausnitzer 1997;Biffi & Casari 2017;Biffi & Rosa 2019;Biffi et al 2022). As highlighted by Crowson (1972), the known Cantharidae larvae seem to fall readily into groups corresponding to the four commonly accepted subfamilies of the adults at that time (Cantharinae Imhoff, Malthininae Kiesenwetter, Chauliognathinae LeConte, and Silinae Mulsant) apart from one, an 'aberrant' cantharid larva.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cantharidae larvae are usually easily recognised by their soft body densely covered with short pubescence, giving them a velvety appearance; other characters, like the prognathous and slightly flattened head, and body with lateral and transversal ampullae with pairs of glandular pores are also diagnostic (Crowson 1972;Ramsdale 2010). They have a rich diversity of structures useful for characterising lineages of Cantharidae and have enabled the production of identification keys, the recognition of genera and groups of species, and the definition of subfamilies (cf., Bøving & Craighead 1931;Striganova 1962;Fitton 1976;Klausnitzer 1997;Biffi & Casari 2017;Biffi & Rosa 2019;Biffi et al 2022). As highlighted by Crowson (1972), the known Cantharidae larvae seem to fall readily into groups corresponding to the four commonly accepted subfamilies of the adults at that time (Cantharinae Imhoff, Malthininae Kiesenwetter, Chauliognathinae LeConte, and Silinae Mulsant) apart from one, an 'aberrant' cantharid larva.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%