2015
DOI: 10.5603/fm.a2018.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of cranial sutures and radiologic evaluation of the variations of intersutural bones

Abstract: Variations of the sutures and sutural bones can be easily misdiagnosed with the fractures of related bony regions in unconscious patients with multiple traumas. During surgical interventions in these type of patients; surgeons must take this fact into consideration in order to make differential diagnosis of fractures and intersutural bone variations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because asterion is a surgical landmark for transverse sinus surgery, its variations were studied many times by researches. Asterion is one of the sites including Wormian bones which vary in shape, size and number (6,11,12,13). Neurosurgeons should be careful when forming burr hole during posterolateral surgical approach to cranium because of the high incidence of Wormian bones in asterion (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because asterion is a surgical landmark for transverse sinus surgery, its variations were studied many times by researches. Asterion is one of the sites including Wormian bones which vary in shape, size and number (6,11,12,13). Neurosurgeons should be careful when forming burr hole during posterolateral surgical approach to cranium because of the high incidence of Wormian bones in asterion (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the expected rate of disturbances of language prehension in these patients [ 10 ], it is possible to find larger variation of the CED value in this group. Another point to consider is that anatomical landmarks used to measure CED according to the procedure described by Simon et al [ 11 ] have an interindividual variation [ 34 37 ]. This could make the cut-off deviation value of 14.1° appear to be examiner-dependent, at least to some degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the expected rate of disturbances of language prehension in these patients [10], it is possible to find larger variation of the CED value in this group. Another point to consider is that anatomical landmarks used to measure CED according to the procedure described by Simon et al [11] have an interindividual variation [33][34][35][36]. This could make the cut-off deviation value of 14.1° appear to be examiner-dependent, at least to some degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%