2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology, geographic distribution, and host preferences are poor predictors of phylogenetic relatedness in the mistletoe genus Viscum L.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A more recent study by Maul & al. () reconstructed the biogeographic history of Viscum L. and related genera (including Korthalsella ). That study concluded that the ancestral distribution for Viscaceae was Australasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A more recent study by Maul & al. () reconstructed the biogeographic history of Viscum L. and related genera (including Korthalsella ). That study concluded that the ancestral distribution for Viscaceae was Australasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Maul & al. () showed that morphology, geographic distribution and host preference in Viscum L. were all poor indicators of phylogenetic relatedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations