2020
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2020.1830000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and hydrodynamics numerical simulation around groynes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, numerical approaches using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were also successfully validated to simulate complex hydraulic phenomena [26,[38][39][40][41][42][43]. It is compulsory to quantify uncertainty for a given confidence level, experimental validation, and uncertainty analysis for engineers [44,45].…”
Section: Verification Of Numerical Model and Laboratory Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, numerical approaches using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were also successfully validated to simulate complex hydraulic phenomena [26,[38][39][40][41][42][43]. It is compulsory to quantify uncertainty for a given confidence level, experimental validation, and uncertainty analysis for engineers [44,45].…”
Section: Verification Of Numerical Model and Laboratory Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNG k-ε was proposed by Yakhot and Orszag [41] and represents a modified version of the k-ε standard model. In particular, the RNG k-ε turbulence model has an additional term in its ε equation (see successive Equation ( 14)) that improves the accuracy for quickly strained and swirling flows and also has good accuracy based on the results of numerical investigations by Bayon et al [28], Daneshfaraz et al [35], Ghaderi et al [42], Lauria et al [43], Ghaderi et al [44] and Pourshahbaz et al [45]. The adopted turbulence scheme is a two-equation model that is expressed as:…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain mesh-independent results, three different mesh sizes were used and the grid convergence index (GCI) methodology was employed to select the appropriate mesh, which is a recommended method for evaluating the discretization error; three various computational meshes were applied to choose the appropriate one, e.g., Bayon et al [28], Ghaderi et al [23], and Abbasi et al [46]. This methodology was proposed by Roache [47] and was developed following the Richardson extrapolation method [45]. Cell size was considered the minimum refinement ratio (r = G coarse /G fine ), which was a value of 1.3, as recommended by Celik et al [48].…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its significant use, the study on spur dyke present in channel bend is still limited (Fazli et al 2008;Vaghefi et al 2019). The majority of studies in this field have been carried out in a straight channel such as Kothyari & Ranga Raju (2001), Jennifer et al (2011), Jiao et al (2017, Kuhnle & Alonso (2013), Pandey et al (2018aPandey et al ( , 2019Pandey et al ( , 2020Pandey et al ( , 2021, Pourshahbaz et al (2020), Singh et al (2020, Xiufang et al (2012) and so on. The flow past a spur dyke present at the channel bend or meander is highly turbulent, leading to the formation of local scour, which further increases with increasing scour depth.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%