“…Within Sphaeridiinae, the larvae of Megasternini and Protosternini do not have distinct teeth on the nasale (Archangelsky 1997(Archangelsky , 1999Fikáček et al 2015Fikáček et al , 2018a; the larvae of Sphaeridiini bear a simple, low, median projection (Archangelsky 1997); the nasale of Coelostomatini is more or less variable, ranging from that with a simple median projection resembling that of Sphaeridium Fabricius, 1775 (e.g., Dactylosternum cacti (LeConte, 1855) in Archangelsky 1994) to closely aggregated teeth-like projections resembling that of Omicrus (e.g., Phaenonotum exstriatum (Say, 1835) in Archangelsky et al 2016b). In comparison to Cylominae, which is a sister taxon of Sphaeridiinae, distinct teeth on the nasale are common in the known aquatic or semi-aquatic larvae of Cylominae (Anticura Spangler, 1979, Cylomissus Broun, 1903, Cylorygmus Orchymont, 1933, and Rygmodus White, 1846Minoshima et al , 2018Seidel et al 2018), and only the terrestrial genera Andotypus Spangler, 1979 andAustrotypus Fikáček, Minoshima &Newton, 2014 do not have distinct teeth on the nasale (Fikáček et al 2014). It seems probable that the reduction of the toothed nasale corresponds to specialized prey preference and feeding behaviour in many terrestrial hydrophilid larvae.…”