Morphologization: Studies in Latin and Romance Morphophonology

Klausenburger, Jurgen

doi:10.1515/9783111345468

Cited by 16 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…11 Therefore, ne deletion allows the truncated clitic to attach to the verb, which is in line with previous research on grammaticalization, whereby subject clitics are becoming bound to the verb at the morphological level (Ashby, 1977;Auger, 1994;Fonseca-Greber, 2000;Fonseca-Greber & Waugh, 2003;Harris, 1978;Klausenburger, 2000;Schwegler, 1990) and are "squeezing out" ne in the process. 11 Therefore, ne deletion allows the truncated clitic to attach to the verb, which is in line with previous research on grammaticalization, whereby subject clitics are becoming bound to the verb at the morphological level (Ashby, 1977;Auger, 1994;Fonseca-Greber, 2000;Fonseca-Greber & Waugh, 2003;Harris, 1978;Klausenburger, 2000;Schwegler, 1990) and are "squeezing out" ne in the process.…”

Section: Partition Analysis: Np Inferred Subject and Pronounsupporting

confidence: 78%

Morphosyntactic and phonological constraints on negative particle variation in French-language chat discourse

Compernolle

2008

Lang Var Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TThis study investigates the variable presence or absence of the negative morpheme ne in online French-language chat environments. The data indicate an overwhelming preference for the omission of ne in most instances of verbal negation, which corroborates previous studies of ne in everyday conversational French. VARBRUL analyses revealed four principal results: (i) subject type (i.e., noun phrase [NP], pronoun, or inferred subject) is the most influential factor; (ii) NPs favor ne presence irrespective of the conditioning factors considered in this study; (iii) the variable presence of ne is conditioned by phonological factors within the subject pronoun category; (iv) the type of second-negative present (i.e., pas vs. secondnegative other than pas) influences ne retention in inferred subject environments.

show abstract

Section: Partition Analysis: Np Inferred Subject and Pronounsupporting

confidence: 78%

Morphosyntactic and phonological constraints on negative particle variation in French-language chat discourse

Compernolle

2008

Lang Var Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fundamentally, this ‘pre‐vocalic’ (Klausenburger : 83) proclisis seems to have been likewise possible with the written forms jo , je , and ge (Pope ; Moignet ; Marchello‐Nizia ) . In effect, in verse texts, scansion strongly suggests that the respective vowels of these orthographically non‐reduced forms of JE were phonologically elided, as their phonological realisation would otherwise have resulted in a surplus syllable, running afoul with the required versification.…”

Section: Old Frenchmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The analysis of subject pronouns as strong elements has thus been extended to configurations which lack the syntactic as well as pragmatic cues given above and which are, essentially, coextensive with finite clauses featuring subject pronouns in directly pre‐ or postverbal position. Consequently, this traditional view has led to the claim that Old French had a single paradigm of subject pronouns constituting strong elements (inter alia Brachet ; Moignet ; ; Adams ; Schwegler ; Dufresne & Dupuis ; Klausenburger ).…”

Section: Old Frenchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in status and paradigms? On subject pronouns in medieval french

Zimmermann

2017

Trans of the Philol Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses the debate on the morpho-syntactic status of subject pronouns in the pre-modern stages of the French language by reinvestigating this issue along with that of the number of paradigms of such elements. On the basis of a collection of the various evidence provided in the literature as well as hitherto ignored and novel empirical insights, the paper discusses the different views put forward and essentially argues that, in its medieval stages, French had two paradigms of, respectively, strong and phonologically clitic subject pronouns. From this finding as well as standard assumptions on the modern (standard) stage of the language the paper eventually concludes that, diachronically, French evinces continuity, rather than changes regarding the two issues under investigation.

show abstract

“…Klausenburger (1999) et Fuß (2005 discutent le rôle pionnier que les pronoms personnels des première et deuxième personnes jouent dans l'évolution vers une simple marque d'accord. C'est de toute évidence le cas en français oral contemporain.…”

Section: Le Redoublement Dans La Parole Adressée à L'enfantunclassified

Quen est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain ?

Culbertson

Legendre²

2008

Congrès Mondial De Linguistique Française 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

2 Le redoublement clitique du sujet L'analyse de la construction au coeur du débat concerne celle illustrée en (1). S'il s'agit de redoublement du SN en position sujet par un clitique alors le clitique lui-même ne peut avoir de statut autre que celui d'affixe flexionnel. Par contre, si (1) est un exemple de dislocation (à gauche) du SN sujet, alors le clitique peut en principe occuper la position sujet (SpecIP). Analyse prosodique du redoublementIl est généralement admis que la dislocation à gauche se distingue par une prosodie particulière et certains indices acoustiques. En particulier, Doetjes et al (2002) ont identifié une signature acoustique des éléments disloqués à gauche, à savoir (i) une montée de F0 sur l'ensemble de l'élément disloqué (avec la cible F0 atteinte au niveau du noyau ou à la fin de la syllabe finale accentuée) et (ii) un allongement de la durée de la syllabe finale: Matériel et ProcédureLes stimuli comprennent des paires quasi-minimales de trois types de phrases cibles: SN sujet non-redoublé (4a), SN sujet redoublé (4b), et SN objet disloqué (4c). Le souci principal a été de minimiser au maximum les différences parmi ces phrases et de les intégrer individuellement à des petits dialogues quasi-identiques.

show abstract

Morphologization: Studies in Latin and Romance Morphophonology

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Morphosyntactic and phonological constraints on negative particle variation in French-language chat discourse

Morphosyntactic and phonological constraints on negative particle variation in French-language chat discourse

Changes in status and paradigms? On subject pronouns in medieval french

Quen est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain ?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Morphologization: Studies in Latin and Romance Morphophonology

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Morphosyntactic and phonological constraints on negative particle variation in French-language chat discourse

Morphosyntactic and phonological constraints on negative particle variation in French-language chat discourse

Changes in status and paradigms? On subject pronouns in medieval french

Quen est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain ?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Quen est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain ?