Background and AimsOne response of plants to climate warming is plasticity of traits, but plasticity might come at a cost and might be limited by the integration among traits or by simultaneous shift of another environmental condition such as shading. Empirical studies treating simultaneously such costs and limitations of plasticity across populations or maternal lineages within species, and how they depend on the environmental context remain few.MethodsWe studied three plant species from the sub-Antarctic, a region currently facing one of the fastest warming worldwide. For multiple populations or maternal lineages we identified (i) plasticity by exposing seeds from a given source population to different temperature and light treatments, (ii) performance (photosynthesis or morphological performance) and (iii) morphological integration of traits in young plants.Key ResultsWe found that plants from more plastic source populations performed poorly. Plants from more integrated source populations were more plastic. Exposure to shade rendered plants less plastic to a warming trend. Moreover, simultaneous shading and warming, rather thansoleshading orsolewarming, reduced plant performance.ConclusionsOur results suggest that phenotypic integration of intraspecific lineages surprisingly might favour rather than limit plasticity. However, our results also suggest that plasticity in response to climate warming may be limited by parallel increase in shading from other plants including competitors, and itself does not ensure success due to induced performance costs.