2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological structure of Zulu sheep based on principal component analysis of body measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
66
3
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
20
66
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, body condition score appeared to be a more useful trait in assessing nutritional consequences than live weight body prediction under extensive management systems. In agreement with the present study, Hassen et al (2012) and Gebreyesus (2010) for some Ethiopian goats; and Mavule et al (2013) for sheep reported the highest correlation between body weight and chest girth. This shows that chest girth might be the best trait to predict live body weight for both goats and other livestock species.…”
Section: Relationships Between Body Weight and Other Linear Body Meassupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, body condition score appeared to be a more useful trait in assessing nutritional consequences than live weight body prediction under extensive management systems. In agreement with the present study, Hassen et al (2012) and Gebreyesus (2010) for some Ethiopian goats; and Mavule et al (2013) for sheep reported the highest correlation between body weight and chest girth. This shows that chest girth might be the best trait to predict live body weight for both goats and other livestock species.…”
Section: Relationships Between Body Weight and Other Linear Body Meassupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Traits like BC, BW, CW and HL in females and BC, BW, CW, PW, HL and EL in bucks were found to have over 10% overall CV value for all three goat types. According to Mavule et al (2013), large variation observed in body measurements is a result of absence of selection, or the body parts are affected more by the environment than others.…”
Section: Phenotypic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coefficient of variation for body weight (14.80) could be important for selection and improvement. In an earlier study of Zulu sheep (Mavule et al, 2013) also reported similar pattern with BW, TL and EL as the most variable and HG, WH and BL as homogenous measurements. While in adult hill goat of Assam (Khargharia et al, 2015) the body weight showed the maximum variation (14.99) followed by paunch girth (9.63) and rump width (9.55).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The study revealed that body measurements except for peripheral traits (tail, ear and horn) were mostly positively and significantly correlated (p<0.05) in both the age groups. In study of Zulu sheep (Mavule et al, 2013) the correlation of body weight with ear length and tail length related combination was also reported on lower side.…”
Section: Phenotypic Correlationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Integration of farmers' practices with our design did not adversely affect efficiency of the breeding program as can be seen from the genetic progress achieved in body weight. This can be explained by the high genetic (Janssens and Vandepitte, 2004;Afolayan et al, 2007) and phenotypic (Mavule et al, 2013b) correlations between body weights and linear size traits in sheep. A significant correspondence between farmers' and experts' selection criteria for the Menz sheep has also been observed in an earlier study (Gizaw et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%