2013
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201201100054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological structure of leaves and dust-retaining capability of common street trees in Guangzhou Municipality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were at least 28 days with no precipitation before sampling. Liu et al (2013) indicated that leaves attained the maximum dust-retaining capabilities [19]. Sampling dates were selected during times of no precipitation and wind.…”
Section: Species Sampledmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were at least 28 days with no precipitation before sampling. Liu et al (2013) indicated that leaves attained the maximum dust-retaining capabilities [19]. Sampling dates were selected during times of no precipitation and wind.…”
Section: Species Sampledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conifers have species-specific features such as leaf morphology, leaf type, and leaf area index that act as the main structures and are considered more effective at capturing PM [16]. Other studies have investigated PM deposition on vegetation in wind tunnels to investigate the deposition velocity on different tree species [18][19]. In conclusion, previous studies on particles captured by plants have mostly focused on particle mass and size distribution [20][21][22][23] to evaluate capture capacities of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang et al [4] conducted a study that shows that different tree species with different morphological characteristics (such as leaf surface characteristics, canopy structure, leaf density, and leaf angle) have different dust retention potential. Because the leaf is the main agent of ambient particle entrapment by plants [37], Chai et al [38] tested leaves and found that roughness and density of villi as adhesion points affect particle detention. Neinhuis [39] proved by research that particle detention ability of easily-wet leaves is strong, while those with special surface structures and hydrophobic wax are not readily wetted and also have poor particle detention ability.…”
Section: Particle Absorption and Species Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capturing capacity for PM 2.5 by the leaves from broad-leaved tree species slightly varied over time, which may be attributed to the morphological structure of the leaf surface [21,22]. Moreover, we observed a significant change in leaf PM accumulation for the six sampled species throughout the growing season [23][24][25]. Throughout the study, we found that the leaves from needle-leaved tree species were perennial, the surface structure of the leaves could change the capturing capacity, and that capturing capacity was less affected by the roughness of the leaves (r = 0.42, 0.41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, we observed a significant change in leaf PM accumulation for the six sampled species throughout the growing season. [23][24][25]. Vertical bars represent + standard error; n = 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%