1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(83)90145-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological stability of the solidification interface under convective conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if for a sample thickness larger than ≃ 25 µm, tip shapes are three-dimensional [12], such thin samples correspond to a "confined 3D" configuration and the pattern will be referred to as 1D thereafter. Added to the relative simplicity of the experimental and optical systems in such a configuration, another major advantage is the drastic reduction of convection in the melt, which is known to strongly affect microstructural pattern formation [13][14][15][16][17]. Even if studies in thin samples have led to significant advances in understanding the dynamics of solidification, quantitative data extracted from thin samples often cannot be extrapolated to large 3D bulk samples [12,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if for a sample thickness larger than ≃ 25 µm, tip shapes are three-dimensional [12], such thin samples correspond to a "confined 3D" configuration and the pattern will be referred to as 1D thereafter. Added to the relative simplicity of the experimental and optical systems in such a configuration, another major advantage is the drastic reduction of convection in the melt, which is known to strongly affect microstructural pattern formation [13][14][15][16][17]. Even if studies in thin samples have led to significant advances in understanding the dynamics of solidification, quantitative data extracted from thin samples often cannot be extrapolated to large 3D bulk samples [12,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] However, unlike the BPS boundary layer assumption used in the CHS criterion, they used a ''deformable'' boundary layer, i.e., one that became perturbed with the s/l interface. At low levels of convection, the CHS and FR criteria predict virtually identical results.…”
Section: B Convective Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the possibility that convection or anisotropic kinetics may have had an effect, FR's [21] criterion and CMC's [31] criterion for vicinal interfaces are considered as well.…”
Section: A Stability Criterion Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that convection innucnccs the planuHo-cell ular tra nsition [1][2][3][4] and primary cellularl dendri tic spacings [5 -7). During directional solidifica tion (OS) the thermal profile in the melt provides stability against convection because the melt density decreases with increasing temperat ure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%