Morphological Structure in Language Processing 2003
DOI: 10.1515/9783110910186.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological facilitation: The role of semantic transparency and family size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the meaning of allow is more transparent in the meaning of allowable than in the meaning of allowance, as another example sweaty is more close in meaning to sweat than sweater is. In recent years, the effect of semantic transparency on morphological facilitation has been a focus of interest (Feldman & Pastizzo, 2003;Feldman & Soltano, 1999;Feldman, Soltano, Pastizzo, & Francis, 2004). In a series of priming experiments Feldman et al (2004) demonstrated a transparency effect such that semantically transparent forms are recognized faster than opaque derived forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the meaning of allow is more transparent in the meaning of allowable than in the meaning of allowance, as another example sweaty is more close in meaning to sweat than sweater is. In recent years, the effect of semantic transparency on morphological facilitation has been a focus of interest (Feldman & Pastizzo, 2003;Feldman & Soltano, 1999;Feldman, Soltano, Pastizzo, & Francis, 2004). In a series of priming experiments Feldman et al (2004) demonstrated a transparency effect such that semantically transparent forms are recognized faster than opaque derived forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schreuder and Baayen (1997) and Bertram, Schreuder, and Baayen (2000) pointed out, using visual lexical decision, that the exclusion of opaque family members from the family counts improves the correlations with response latencies. Similarly, in priming experiments the morphological family size of a target word interacts with the amount of priming elicited by semantically related prime-target pairs (Feldman & Pastizzo, 2003). De Jong, Schreuder, and Baayen (2000), again using visual lexical decision, provided further evidence that the effect of family size is not mediated by surface form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Analogously, despite a shared morpheme and depending on the particular affix, derived morphological relatives tend to vary substantially in their semantic similarity to the target. Depending on the task, the magnitude of morphological facilitation among derivations can be sensitive to the degree of overlap in meaning between prime and target (Feldman & Pastizzo, 2003;. Importantly, as family size increases, morphological relatives that share meaning as well as form, and words that share form with minimal semantic overlap, tended to become progressively more distinct.…”
Section: 2 Semantic Effects Among Morphological Relativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the meaning of allow is more transparent in the meaning of allowable than in the meaning of allowance. In recent years, the effect of semantic transparency on morphological facilitation has been a focus of interest (Feldman & Pastizzo, 2003;Feldman & Soltano, 1999;Feldman, Soltano, Pastizzo, & Francis, 2004). In large part, meaning similarity among morphological relatives is a function of semantic transparency, the degree to which words composed from a common base morpheme (e.g.…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%