2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-017-5492-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological, Electromagnetic, and Absorbing Properties of POMA and PAni/Carbon Black Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured reflection loss of the PPCP composited with 0.2 wt.% of carbon approaches −11.16 dB at 12.4 GHz for a 7.0 mm thickness, which corresponds to ≤ −10 dB reflection loss (i.e., more than 90% absorption of the incoming radar wave). These data are comparable with those of the carbonbased radar-absorbing materials reported in the literature, such as carbon nanotube-based composites (98.54% absorption at 11.1 GHz with a thickness of 2.0 mm [12], 98.4% absorption at 8 GHz with a thickness of 4.0 mm [11]), and carbon-based composites (99.5% absorption at 11.5 GHz with a thickness of 4.0 mm [13]). Compared to the above mentioned literature data, the reflection loss of the PPCP composited with 0.2 wt.% of carbon was acceptable, because a selfsetting particle-stabilized porous ceramic panel is lowcost (the inexpensive raw materials), lightweight (the particle-stabilized pore structure), and easy to prepare (the self-setting fabrication method).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured reflection loss of the PPCP composited with 0.2 wt.% of carbon approaches −11.16 dB at 12.4 GHz for a 7.0 mm thickness, which corresponds to ≤ −10 dB reflection loss (i.e., more than 90% absorption of the incoming radar wave). These data are comparable with those of the carbonbased radar-absorbing materials reported in the literature, such as carbon nanotube-based composites (98.54% absorption at 11.1 GHz with a thickness of 2.0 mm [12], 98.4% absorption at 8 GHz with a thickness of 4.0 mm [11]), and carbon-based composites (99.5% absorption at 11.5 GHz with a thickness of 4.0 mm [13]). Compared to the above mentioned literature data, the reflection loss of the PPCP composited with 0.2 wt.% of carbon was acceptable, because a selfsetting particle-stabilized porous ceramic panel is lowcost (the inexpensive raw materials), lightweight (the particle-stabilized pore structure), and easy to prepare (the self-setting fabrication method).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, carbon-based conductive particles have been widely used because of their good absorption performance in the high frequency bands [10]. These include carbon nanotube-based composites [11,12] and carbon-based composites [13,14]. Because porous ceramics are both inherently lightweight and inexpensive, it is worthwhile to study them as low-cost lightweight radar absorbing materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, materials with properties of reflectivity and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness (SE) have attracted intensive attention in aerospace, engineering, and telecommunication areas, all with civil and military applications 1–6 . Carbon nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes (CNT), carbon nanofibers, graphite nanoplatelets, and carbon black 3,7–12 are good candidates for developing composites that attend the technological challenges and specifications of the market demands in the mentioned areas. On the other hand, the fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have received particular attention due to their low weight, resistance to corrosion, flexibility, and processing advantages 13–15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%