2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological diversity of caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus) accessions in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey: Potential utility for caprification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(31 reference statements)
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Essid et al (2017) found the average fruit weight of 15 caprifigs to be 14.26 g. This value was lower than in this present study. In Turkey, the morphological characteristics of six standard cultivars and 90 caprifig accessions grown in the eastern Mediterranean region were investigated by Caliskan et al (2017). The average fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length, and ostiole width values measured in the genotypes investigated in this current study were 22.9 g, 41.5 mm, 48.5 mm, and 1.8 mm, respectively, and were in agreement with those found by Caliskan et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Essid et al (2017) found the average fruit weight of 15 caprifigs to be 14.26 g. This value was lower than in this present study. In Turkey, the morphological characteristics of six standard cultivars and 90 caprifig accessions grown in the eastern Mediterranean region were investigated by Caliskan et al (2017). The average fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length, and ostiole width values measured in the genotypes investigated in this current study were 22.9 g, 41.5 mm, 48.5 mm, and 1.8 mm, respectively, and were in agreement with those found by Caliskan et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Turkey, the morphological characteristics of six standard cultivars and 90 caprifig accessions grown in the eastern Mediterranean region were investigated by Caliskan et al (2017). The average fruit weight, fruit width, fruit length, and ostiole width values measured in the genotypes investigated in this current study were 22.9 g, 41.5 mm, 48.5 mm, and 1.8 mm, respectively, and were in agreement with those found by Caliskan et al (2017). In the fig, one of the oldest fruit species in the world, studies have been conducted to determine morphological and pomological characteristics of edible genotypes as well as male genotypes (Khadivi et al, 2018;Mirheidari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the fig cultivars/genotypes grown in the world, 78% are common types, less than 4% are San Pedro types, and the remaining 18% are Smyrna types (FLAISHMAN et al, 2008). However, the studies on figs in Turkey showed that figs are mainly cauducous type (Smyrna) depending on fruit set (CALISKAN et al, 2017). The results were similar to the data in this study.…”
Section: Phenotypic Variation Of Plant Characteristics and Harvest Timessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results displayed that similar clustering was observed due to the selection of figs from nearby villages as well as the presence of synonym, homonym, and the similar genotypes in the eastern Mediterranean of Turkey (CALISKAN and POLAT, 2012a). In addition, KUDEN et al (2008) We know that the phenotyping characterization is the most critical process of fig germplasm research, but due to the parameters based on environmental conditions such as plant and fruit quality characteristics it is not very useful (CALISKAN et al, 2012;CALISKAN et al, 2017). Thus, the combined analyses of phenotypic parameters and molecular markers will be required to definitively description genotypes in fig germplasm studies.…”
Section: Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological traits are commonly used, though sometimes not very effective, for assessment of genetic relationship in plant species (Elameen et al, ; Wu et al, ; Caliskan, Bayazit, Ilgin, & Karatas, ). Previous studies reported that classification based on horticultural traits were capable of reflecting the genetic relationship of different chrysanthemum cultivars (Shao et al, ; Zhang, Dai, Hong, & Song, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%