2019
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic characterization of anemone‐type chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) using floral morphology and SRAP markers

Abstract: Abbreviations: DFD, disc flower diameter; ID, inflorescence diameter; LLL, length of the longest lobe; NRF, number of ray florets; NTF, number of tubular florets; NTFL, number of tubular floret lobes; RFL, ray floret length; RFW, ray floret width; SL, style length; TFL, tubular floret length; TFL/SL, tubular floret length/style length; TFW, tubular floret width. AbstractAn appreciation of the genetic diversity retained in the gene pool of anemone-type chrysanthemums is needed to drive further genetic improveme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the correlation of − 0.055 was in our study and the value was − 0.45 in Fan et al (2020). A correlation between FD and DFD was observed within a panel of anemone-type chrysanthemum accessions (Yang et al 2020). These findings suggest that flower traits are complex in chrysanthemum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the correlation of − 0.055 was in our study and the value was − 0.45 in Fan et al (2020). A correlation between FD and DFD was observed within a panel of anemone-type chrysanthemum accessions (Yang et al 2020). These findings suggest that flower traits are complex in chrysanthemum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The identification of the necessary molecular markers has been fueled by genetic analyses such as quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping and genome-wide association study (GWAS). In chrysanthemum, many studies attempted to determine the genes associated with important traits using traditional molecular approaches such as amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), random amplified polymorphic DNA markers (RAPD), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSRs), restriction fragment length polymorphism markers (RFLPs), expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeats (EST-SSRs), and sequence-related amplified polymorphisms (SRAPs) (Zhang et al 2010(Zhang et al , 2011Fan et al 2020;Yang et al 2020). However, the number of available markers for genetic analysis is limited and the resulting genomic regions were large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal components analyses for three groups (Group one, two, three) were conducted with R studio by using the FactoMineR [ 57 ] and factoextra R packages [ 59 ]. The relatedness between morphological traits among populations for each group were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients and tested at p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01 [ 60 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatedness between morphological traits among populations for each group were assessed using Pearson's correlation coe cients and tested at p<0.05 and p<0.01 [59].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%