1980
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.44.6.657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological considerations pertaining to recognition of atrial isomerism. Consequences for sequential chamber localisation.

Abstract: SUMMARYThe atrial morphology and venous connections were assessed "blind" in 51 necropsy specimens from patients with visceral heterotaxy. This was compared with bronchial morphology as established by dissection. Six specimens were found to have both atria and bronchi in situs solitus or inversus, and were rejected. In the remainder, atrial isomerism was diagnosed, though this required minor revision of the atrial assessment in two patients. Thirty-four patients had isomeric right atria and bronchi, while 11 h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eschewing a "deductive" approach to segmental analysis, Dr Robert Anderson and his colleagues from the United Kingdom, using a segmental approach, advocated a sequential "connections" approach. [22][23][24] This approach did not focus on infundibular anatomy, and their initial approach did not use the concept of ventricular loops, nor did their approach incorporate the bracketed shortcut alphabet nomenclature. These 2 schools of cardiac nomenclature were initially quite polarized, and although they share many similarities, their differences have not been completely resolved.…”
Section: Cardiac Anatomy and The Nosology Of Congenital Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eschewing a "deductive" approach to segmental analysis, Dr Robert Anderson and his colleagues from the United Kingdom, using a segmental approach, advocated a sequential "connections" approach. [22][23][24] This approach did not focus on infundibular anatomy, and their initial approach did not use the concept of ventricular loops, nor did their approach incorporate the bracketed shortcut alphabet nomenclature. These 2 schools of cardiac nomenclature were initially quite polarized, and although they share many similarities, their differences have not been completely resolved.…”
Section: Cardiac Anatomy and The Nosology Of Congenital Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] With their clinical colleagues, they compiled clinicopathological correlations and published extensively on specimens that constituted their cardiac registries. Collectively, they described and characterized the entire spectrum of congenitally malformed hearts and produced a number of classifications of various cardiac anomalies, including tricuspid atresia, interruption of the aortic arch, truncus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, double-inlet ventricle, and double-outlet right ventricle.…”
Section: Cardiac Anatomy and The Nosology Of Congenital Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of cardiac situs is the first step in the analysis and diagnosis of complex CHD (2). Some still doubt the presence of isomerism in subsets of visceral heterotaxy (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Splenic abnormality was not always accompanied by isomerism (14); 13% to 18% of cases showed splenic anomaly independent of the cardiac situs (2,15). The survival rate with right isomerism is poor compared to that with left isomerism, in part because of the increased severity and complexity of CHD and the increased risk for sepsis in the absence of the spleen (16).…”
Section: Y K Hong Et Al 678mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation