2014
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-95022014000400045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Comparison of the Filiform Papillae of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as Domestic Mammals and Egyptian Fruit Bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) as Wild Mammals Using Scanning Electron Microscopic Specimens

Abstract: ABUMANDOUR, M. A. M. Morphological comparison of the filiform papillae of New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)as domestic mammals and Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) as wild mammals using scanning electron microscopic specimens. Int. J. Morphol., 32(4):1407-1417, 2014. SUMMARY:This paper presents a comparison of the morphological structure of the filiform papillae in New Zealand white rabbits as domestic mammals and Egyptian fruit bats as wild mammals. This study was carried out on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEM information about the appearance of different forms of the filiform papillae that are well developed in animals was plenty (Abumandour, ); however, the SEM information about the filiform papillae in avian tongue was limited. In the current study, the lingual apex and body had several filiform‐like papillae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEM information about the appearance of different forms of the filiform papillae that are well developed in animals was plenty (Abumandour, ); however, the SEM information about the filiform papillae in avian tongue was limited. In the current study, the lingual apex and body had several filiform‐like papillae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the anatomical SEM published articles, the presence of the filiform papillae and its subtypes are well‐developed in the animals (El‐Bakary & Abumandour, ) and the its subtypes reached to the six subtypes in the Egyptian eating fruit bats (Abumandour, ; Abumandour & El‐Bakary, ), while the presence of the filiform papillae in the bird species is limited. The current work observed the presence of the filiform papillae on the lateral surface of the lingual body, similar observation noted in the duck and goose (Jackowiak et al, ; Marzban Abbasabadi & Sayrafi, ; Skieresz‐Szewczyk et al, ), while these filiform papillae were observed in the dorsal surface of the lingual apex and body as observed in the Eurasian coot (Abumandour & El‐Bakary, ), house sparrow (Abumandour, ), common kestrel and Hume's tawny owl (Abumandour & El‐Bakary, ), and the Egyptian laughing dove (Abumandour & El‐Bakary, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, posteromedially directed conical papillae at the lingual root. The difference in the papillary orientation is more clear in the bats as they have a special character in their life, feed intake during fly (Jackowiak et al., ; Mqokeli and Downs, ; Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ; Abumandour, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%