2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a CT imaging reference model because CT images are known to be highly accurate 1 , 13 , 14 , 23 . Previously, Lim et al 24 used CT images of two cervical spines to show that a 3D spinal motion analysis method was accurate within 1 mm of translation and 1° of rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a CT imaging reference model because CT images are known to be highly accurate 1 , 13 , 14 , 23 . Previously, Lim et al 24 used CT images of two cervical spines to show that a 3D spinal motion analysis method was accurate within 1 mm of translation and 1° of rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexion increases the foraminal height width and foraminal area. Extension decreases them [27,33,41]. After cervical retraction, dimensions of the cervical neural foramina show no significant change, except at C3-C4 [29].…”
Section: Dimensions and Movementmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Foraminal stenosis of the C5 nerve root indicated stenosis of the C5 intervertebral foramen (between C4 and C5) caused by improper alignment, facet hypertrophy, disc space narrowing, or bony spurs. [ 17 , 18 ] Determination of foraminal stenosis was based mainly on oblique views of cervical radiographs at the site of the affected shoulder (Fig. 3 ); other views were used for comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%