2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.2016.338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morning glory species interference on the development and yield of soybeans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Carvalho et al (2014) observed that allowing I. hederifolia plants to coexist with corn crops reduced the growth of and accumulation of macronutrients by the corn plants with negative consequences for crop productivity and serious disturbances during mechanical harvesting when the weed is fully developed. In soybean, one Ipomoea plant•m −2 can reduce the yield by approximately 26%, and the negative impact of I. purpurea on soybean growth and yield is greater than that of I. grandifolia (Pagnoncelli et al, 2017). Although they possess similar characteristics, species within a genus -and in the case of morning glory, different genera -may differ in their susceptibility to an herbicide and thus may not respond uniformly to its application (Christoffoleti et al, 2006;Orzari et al, 2013;Campos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carvalho et al (2014) observed that allowing I. hederifolia plants to coexist with corn crops reduced the growth of and accumulation of macronutrients by the corn plants with negative consequences for crop productivity and serious disturbances during mechanical harvesting when the weed is fully developed. In soybean, one Ipomoea plant•m −2 can reduce the yield by approximately 26%, and the negative impact of I. purpurea on soybean growth and yield is greater than that of I. grandifolia (Pagnoncelli et al, 2017). Although they possess similar characteristics, species within a genus -and in the case of morning glory, different genera -may differ in their susceptibility to an herbicide and thus may not respond uniformly to its application (Christoffoleti et al, 2006;Orzari et al, 2013;Campos et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly not found in the sugarcane harvest, however, it may interfere in shorter-cycle crops. According to researchers, I. purpurea plants interfered more in soybean crops than I. grandifolia plants (Pagnoncelli et al, 2017), reducing the leaf area and the dry mass of crop leaves, in addition to the fact that I. purpurea reduced the harvest efficiency and productivity of pepper (Schutte, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, the presence of ivyleaf morningglories infesting agricultural areas has increased over the last years, mainly for the Ipomoea hederifolia, I. quamoclit, I. grandifolia and I. nil species (Kuva et al, 2007). Areas where these species prevail have their crop productivity reduced, as observed in the presence of I. hederifolia, which reduced the productivity of culms in sugarcane by 46%, and in the presence of I. grandifolia and I. purpurea, which reduced in up to 80% the soybean productivity (Silva et al, 2009;Pagnoncelli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are an undesirable species for cereal and sugarcane crops, mainly due to the difficulties that they cause for mechanical harvesting (Kissmann & Groth, ; Moreira & Bragança, ). They are also among the most important weeds for soyabean crops, causing significant yield losses when not properly controlled (Pagnoncelli et al ., ). Another important aspect of the species of this genus is that they are annual, which means that all stages of their cycle occur within a year (Lorenzi, ), making control necessary before seed production to prevent dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%