2020
DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More than self‐interest: Why different classes have different attitudes to income inequality

Abstract: The connection between social class and political preferences is among the most well established in the social sciences. This association is typically taken as prima facie evidence of economic self‐interest: Classes hold different attitudes, values, and party preferences because they have different economic interests. However, this assumption has rarely been tested empirically. In this article, we use survey data from 18 West European countries to examine why classes differ on a central aspect of political pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK between 40% (Charlwood, 2002) and 46% (Freeman and Bryson, 2006) of non-union workers would join a union if their colleagues formed one at their workplace. 4 That support for unions among the surveyed platform workers here was similar to that found among standard workers in several high-income countries is perhaps surprising given the individualist attitudes that autonomous, self-employed workers have typically been found to hold (Evans, 1993;Jansen, 2011;Langsaether and Evans, 2020;Knutsen, 2018;Svallfors, 2006;Van de Werfhorst and de Graaf, 2014).…”
Section: Anger Dependence and Communication Among Remote Platform Workerssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In the UK between 40% (Charlwood, 2002) and 46% (Freeman and Bryson, 2006) of non-union workers would join a union if their colleagues formed one at their workplace. 4 That support for unions among the surveyed platform workers here was similar to that found among standard workers in several high-income countries is perhaps surprising given the individualist attitudes that autonomous, self-employed workers have typically been found to hold (Evans, 1993;Jansen, 2011;Langsaether and Evans, 2020;Knutsen, 2018;Svallfors, 2006;Van de Werfhorst and de Graaf, 2014).…”
Section: Anger Dependence and Communication Among Remote Platform Workerssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Our friendly amendment to public opinion scholars' workhorse model both builds on and speaks to extensive cross-sectional evidence that economic attitudes vary with economic circumstances, whether captured by class, education or income (Cavaille & Trump, 2015;Chan & Goldthorpe, 2007;Langsaether & Evans, 2020). While this relationship is well documented, its interpretation is far from consensual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“… Zaller's model, developed in the 1990s, does not mention material circumstances, overlooking the robust cross-sectional relationship between economic position and attitudes (seeLangsaether and Evans (2020) for review). This relationship makes material self-interest an obvious candidate as a mediating mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otros estudios han llegado a conclusiones similares a las de Wright. Estos han demostrado que la posición de la clase de los individuos es, al denotar su lugar en las relaciones de producción, un determinante relevante de la identidad de clase, de sus intereses de clase (por ejemplo, sus preferencias redistributivas) y de sus percepciones de conflicto clases (Dodson, 2017;Edlund y Lindh, 2015;Elbert y Pérez, 2018;Langsaether y Evans, 2020;Robison y Stubager, 2018). Por ejemplo, Dodson (2017) ha demostrado que quienes pertenecen a la clase trabajadora tienen más probabilidades de apoyar políticas redistributivas vía impuestos que quienes pertenecen a la clase de profesionales y ejecutivos, mientras que en su estudio de una veintena de países desarrollados Edlund y Lindh (2015) concluyen que las personas de clase trabajadora perciben más conflicto de clases que las personas de clase privilegiada.…”
Section: Revisión De La Literatura E Hipótesisunclassified