Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3357236.3395445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More Than Human Aesthetics

Abstract: For guidance on citations see FAQs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of approaches to animal-centred design have been proposed [7,13,24,49,51,53]. However, these lack agreement and consistency and mostly involve applying HCI models directly to animal-computer contexts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of approaches to animal-centred design have been proposed [7,13,24,49,51,53]. However, these lack agreement and consistency and mostly involve applying HCI models directly to animal-computer contexts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To bridge the gap between theory and practice in developing novel interactive interfaces for animals, researchers frequently borrow and modify the models and concepts of HCI (e.g. [7,13,24,49,51,53]). These methods, such as co-design and participatory design, aim to involve the user in the design process to shape the technologies around how the user behaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is probable, if not assured, that a wiggle will receive a response. Moreover, the toy moves independently as well as being flexible, thus offering exciting performative aesthetics such that 'action enables sensory perception and sensory perception informs action' [24].…”
Section: Appropriate Playmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding ways to include the animals as co-designers is a key discussion point. See Webber et al ([8], p. 1715) for an example with orangutans and French et al [67] with elephants for more detailed case-specific considerations. Both studies determined that prototyping and testing ideas directly with the animals on an iterative trial and error basis was the best way to determine the animal's level of interest, ability to use the feature, and the project's likely success.…”
Section: Co-design With Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Webber [8] and French et al [67] describe alternate animal co-design strategies, which may vary widely depending upon the species being accommodated. They emphasize the need to use flexible evaluation techniques, allowing iterative experimentation and prototype evolution.…”
Section: Prototype Testing Using Animal Co-design Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%