2014
DOI: 10.3177/jnsv.60.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More than 50% of Pregnant Japanese Women with an Intake of 150 ^|^mu;g Dietary Folate per 1,000 kcal Can Maintain Values above the Cut-Off

Abstract: Summary Most Japanese pregnant women do not take the estimated average requirement (EAR) of folate for pregnant women, which is 400 mg/d. Nevertheless, folate deficiencies have not been reported. We examined biomarkers for evaluating the status of folate in pregnant Japanese women. Apparently healthy pregnant Japanese women were cross-sectionally recruited from a private obstetric hospital. We measured nutritional biomarkers of folate in these women, as well as their folate intake. The numbers of subjects were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear what specific factors would contribute to the over- or under-reporting of folate intake, but this remains a theoretical concern, and could potentially contribute to differences between reported folate intake in men and women. Though the use of quantitative estimates from such questionnaires has been previously reported in the literature [ 63 , 64 , 65 ], the definitive validation of such approaches for measuring long-term folate intake would require observation of the participant’s diet over a prolonged time not feasible for most studies [ 48 ]. Many suggest that such a comparison of quantitative nutrient estimates relative to dietary cutoffs is only an approximate unless individual variation is accounted for by modeling or in calibration studies [ 48 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear what specific factors would contribute to the over- or under-reporting of folate intake, but this remains a theoretical concern, and could potentially contribute to differences between reported folate intake in men and women. Though the use of quantitative estimates from such questionnaires has been previously reported in the literature [ 63 , 64 , 65 ], the definitive validation of such approaches for measuring long-term folate intake would require observation of the participant’s diet over a prolonged time not feasible for most studies [ 48 ]. Many suggest that such a comparison of quantitative nutrient estimates relative to dietary cutoffs is only an approximate unless individual variation is accounted for by modeling or in calibration studies [ 48 , 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnant women with a tendency to be anemia may be at an increased risk of the condition during weeks 5–10 of gestation, the critical period of fetal organ development. Second, according to previous research, the nutritional intake of Japanese women during pregnancy is almost the same as before pregnancy despite the body’s increased demand for iron during pregnancy, which is lower than the nutritional intake recommended by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 9,10 . In addition, for women who have morning sickness, it can be difficult to take iron supplements during the early stage of pregnancy 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Q, quartile. pregnant populations in Japan (mean: 1720 kcal/d at .31 wk of gestation) and China (median: 1930 kcal/d at 21-24 of wk of gestation) (45,46). Means 6 SDs of carbohydrate and total sugar intakes during pregnancy in our cohort were 238 6 74 and 76 6 41 g, respectively; these amounts translated to percentages of energy contributions of 51.8% 6 8.6% and 16.2% 6 7.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Generalizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%