2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More priorities, more problems? Decision-making with multiple energy, development and climate objectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 229 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bhardwaj et al [41] examined the decision approaches in his review covering 167 studies related with multiple energy, development and climate objectives. Waltho et al [26] reviewed 105 articles on green supply chain networks between 2010 and 2017.…”
Section: Subject Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhardwaj et al [41] examined the decision approaches in his review covering 167 studies related with multiple energy, development and climate objectives. Waltho et al [26] reviewed 105 articles on green supply chain networks between 2010 and 2017.…”
Section: Subject Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the EU voluntary schemes of biofuel production would be replaced with the international agreements. Promoting multi-sectoral contribution, the framework of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) of the Paris Climate Agreement allows countries to simultaneously implement national priorities and global climate objectives (Buyx & Tait, 2011;Bhardwaj et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, MCA frameworks tend to provide little guidance to decision-makers beyond limited case studies (Fung and Helgeson, 2017). Moreover, since few ex ante tools are available to decisionmakers, MCA remains mostly academic (Bhardwaj et al, 2019). While system dynamics can yield important insights, it is still only semi-quantitative and useful mainly for identifying relative importance.…”
Section: A Note: Benefit Cost Analysis In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%