2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More confusion and frustration, better learning: The impact of erroneous examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other recent research has examined the effects of confusion and frustration on learning. Research performance, confusion, and frustration bring about better learning effects for learners [ 69 , 70 , 71 ]. However, this may only apply to certain activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent research has examined the effects of confusion and frustration on learning. Research performance, confusion, and frustration bring about better learning effects for learners [ 69 , 70 , 71 ]. However, this may only apply to certain activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been shown that analysing one's own solutions and errors may improve learning outcomes (Hughes et al, 2019;Kapur, 2014). Here, however, assessing their own mistakes frequently left students confused or agonized (Di Leo et al, 2019;Richey et al, 2019). Affective challenges such as these have to be addressed if problem-based teaching approaches are to be optimally successful, hence the need to develop metacognitive skills and selfregulation among students.…”
Section: Teaching Approaches In Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, building on the isolated elements effect which posits that for novices very complex information is at times better separated in individual elements first (Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002), authors hypothesized that learning would improve if novices are presented with isolated parts of a complex character before being presented with the whole character (i.e., isolated-integrated vs. integrated only). Secondly, drawing on the finding that adding variability across learning tasks helps learners construct more general knowledge and thereby boost test performance (i.e., the variability effect, see: Likourezos, Kalyuga, & Sweller, 2019;Paas & Van Merriënboer, 1994) Richey et al, 2019;Schmitz, Schnabel, Stricker, Fischer, & Guttenstormsen, 2017). The focus on including errors in examples started early in social-cognitive research, where many studies compared the effects of mastery models showing an ideal performance to coping models showing and later on correcting performance errors (e.g., Schunk & Hanson, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important ongoing development in the example literature is a greater focus on learning from (productive) errors. On the one hand, this development describes a rekindled interest in the role of erroneous information in examples (e.g., Richey et al, 2019; Schmitz, Schnabel, Stricker, Fischer, & Guttenstormsen, 2017). The focus on including errors in examples started early in social‐cognitive research, where many studies compared the effects of mastery models showing an ideal performance to coping models showing and later on correcting performance errors (e.g., Schunk & Hanson, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%