2001
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.13.5842-5850.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morbilliviruses Use Signaling Lymphocyte Activation Molecules (CD150) as Cellular Receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
283
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
283
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Asterisks (*) correspond to significant (P,0.05) differences between the DK91-infected and mock-inoculated mink; g indicate significant differences involving the Snyder Hill-infected mink. CDV has been found to be linked closely to SLAM recognition and constitutes a virulence determinant (Condack et al, 2007;Tatsuo et al, 2001;von Messling et al, 2006). We found a rapid and unexpectedly extensive virus invasion of lymphocytes in the mildly virulent wildtype infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Asterisks (*) correspond to significant (P,0.05) differences between the DK91-infected and mock-inoculated mink; g indicate significant differences involving the Snyder Hill-infected mink. CDV has been found to be linked closely to SLAM recognition and constitutes a virulence determinant (Condack et al, 2007;Tatsuo et al, 2001;von Messling et al, 2006). We found a rapid and unexpectedly extensive virus invasion of lymphocytes in the mildly virulent wildtype infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, accumulating evidence strongly links immunosuppression and lymphopenia not only to direct effects following infection and subsequent destruction of signalling lymphocytic activating molecule (SLAM)-positive immune cells and precursor cells in the acute phase of the infections, but also to indirect effects modulating the host innate and adaptive immune systems (Cruz et al, 2006;Devaux et al, 2008;Heaney et al, 2005;Karp et al, 1996;Schlender et al, 1996;Tatsuo et al, 2001;von Messling et al, 2006). The relative impact on virulence of the different mechanisms modulating the immune system in vivo is, however, not yet clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measles virus, a single amino acid substitution within the H gene is able to confer entry into different cell types in vitro (Hsu et al, 1998;Seki et al, 2006). The signaling lymphocyte activation molecule has long been proposed as a morbillivirus receptor (Tatsuo et al, 2001), and although exact virus:receptor interactions are unknown, it is now generally accepted that multiple receptors are utilized by these viruses (Fujita et al, 2007) and that this must have a significant effect on the potential for species-to-species transmission (von Messling et al, 2001). For CDV, it has been demonstrated that molecular adaptation at specific receptor-binding sites of the H gene is associated with the spread of this virus from dogs to novel noncanid hosts in the wild (McCarthy et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, members infect man: measles virus (MV); cattle: rinderpest virus (RPV); sheep and goats: peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV); a wide range of carnivores: canine distemper virus (CDV); seals: phocine distemper virus (PDV); and porpoises and dolphins: cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV) [2]. As this review focuses on the involvement of these viruses in human disease, we can be very brief about RPV, PPRV, CeMV, and PDV, since in spite of their clear evolutionary relationship with MV and CDV and their potential to use the same cell surface receptors [3,4], they have not been implicated in any human disease. Domesticated animals infected with RPV or PPRV could potentially transmit very large doses of infectious virus to those who care for them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%