Morality in intergroup conflict

Halevy, Nir; Kreps, Tamar A.; Weisel, Ori; Goldenberg, Amit

doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.006

Cited by 22 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We suggest that an analogy for moral judgments is fire: affectively hot (Gray & Wegner, 2011a; Haidt, 2003; Hutcherson & Gross, 2011), igniting strong views (Skitka et al, 2005), and even serving as a common focus for ritual that can both bring groups together (Graham & Haidt, 2010; Greene, 2013) or be used to destroy (Atran & Ginges, 2012; Halevy, Kreps, Weisel, & Goldenberg, 2015). Fire requires three components to ignite—heat, oxygen, and fuel; moral judgment may also require three components.…”

Section: What Makes An Act Immoral? Norms Affect and Harmmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm

Schein

Gray

2017

Pers Soc Psychol Rev

434

497

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The nature of harm-and therefore moral judgment-may be misunderstood. Rather than an objective matter of reason, we argue that harm should be redefined as an intuitively perceived continuum. This redefinition provides a new understanding of moral content and mechanism-the constructionist Theory of Dyadic Morality (TDM). TDM suggests that acts are condemned proportional to three elements: norm violations, negative affect, and-importantly-perceived harm. This harm is dyadic, involving an intentional agent causing damage to a vulnerable patient (A→P). TDM predicts causal links both from harm to immorality (dyadic comparison) and from immorality to harm (dyadic completion). Together, these two processes make the "dyadic loop," explaining moral acquisition and polarization. TDM argues against intuitive harmless wrongs and modular "foundations," but embraces moral pluralism through varieties of values and the flexibility of perceived harm. Dyadic morality impacts understandings of moral character, moral emotion, and political/cultural differences, and provides research guidelines for moral psychology.

show abstract

Section: What Makes An Act Immoral? Norms Affect and Harmmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm

Schein

Gray

2017

Pers Soc Psychol Rev

434

497

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our most highly valued moral beliefs are those held with extreme moral conviction. Moral values exert a powerful motivational force that vary both in direction and intensity, guide the differentiation of just from unjust courses of action, and direct behavior towards desirable outcomes (Halevy et al 2015), and serve as compelling mandates regarding what one "ought" to do in certain circumstances. This can be seen, for instance, in expressions of support for war, which depend primarily on perceptions of moral righteousness rather than strategic efficacy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dark Side of Morality – Neural Mechanisms Underpinning Moral Convictions and Support for Violence

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Beberapa cara telah dilakukan misalnya dengan membangun harapan, yakni penghidupan layak (upah ganti untung lahan) dan pekerjaan jika masyarakat Samin mau untuk menyetujui dibangunnya pabrik semen. Cara ini tidak salah bahkan di beberapa jurnal seperti Halevy, Kreps, Weisel,& Goldenberg, 2015;Sallfors, Fasth, & Hallberg, 2002; menyatakan bahwa memunculkan harapan-harapan baru menjadi cara yang efektif dalam menyelesaikan konflik. Bahkan dengan memberikan sentimen harapan yang baik akan memunculkan dukungan untuk perilaku kompromistis (Cohen-Chen, Halperin,Porat, & Bar-Tal, 2014).…”

Section: Antroposentrismeunclassified

Resistensi kelompok samin terhadap modernitas revolusi industri 4.0

Feriandi

Malihah

Maftuh

2020

jimd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Revolusi industri ditandai dengan modernitas teknologi untuk membantu pekerjaan manusia, meski dunia telah diramaikan dengan konsep tersebut masih terdapat berbagai kelompok yang menolak atau resisten terhadap modernitas ala Revolusi Industri 4.0. Dengan segela upaya kelompok tersebut mencoba mempertahankan identitas kulturalnya dari hantaman perubahan zaman, salah satu kelompok masyarakat yang dikenal resisten dengan perubahan zaman adalah Kelompok masyarakat Samin. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan karakteristtik masyarakat samin dan mengungkapkan penyebab masyarakat samin resisten terhadap perubahan serta bagaimana penyelesaian konflik yang terjadi antara masyarakat samin yang pro dan resisten terhadap perubahan. Metode yang digunakan dalam peleitian ini adalah studi kasus dan pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan mengunakan instrumen wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Subjek penelitian ini yakni masyarakat kelompok samin yang tinggal di Pati Jawa Tengah. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa masyarakat samin memiliki karakteristik utama yakni: Sederhana, jujur, Resisten terhadap kemodernan, dan cinta lingkungan. sedangkan alasan masyarakat samin resisten terhadap pembangunan modernitas terdiri dari beberapa faktor utama yakni faktor sosio kultural masyarakat samin, faktor Etika lingkungan, dan Faktor ekonomi.

show abstract

Morality in intergroup conflict

Cited by 22 publications

References 47 publications

The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm

The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm

The Dark Side of Morality – Neural Mechanisms Underpinning Moral Convictions and Support for Violence

Resistensi kelompok samin terhadap modernitas revolusi industri 4.0

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About