2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Orientation Guilt Scale (MOGS): Development and validation of a novel guilt measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moral Orientation Guilt Scale (MOGS; Mancini et al (2022)): the MOGS is a 17-items scale to assess the different types of guilt referring to 4 domains: Dirtiness (α = .84), Moral Norm Violation (α = .89), Empathy (α = .69) and Harm (α = .85). Dirtiness and Moral Norm Violation scores can be added together to obtain the Deontological guilt total score (α = .90), while Empathy and Harm scores can be summed to obtain Altruistic guilt total score (α = .90).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moral Orientation Guilt Scale (MOGS; Mancini et al (2022)): the MOGS is a 17-items scale to assess the different types of guilt referring to 4 domains: Dirtiness (α = .84), Moral Norm Violation (α = .89), Empathy (α = .69) and Harm (α = .85). Dirtiness and Moral Norm Violation scores can be added together to obtain the Deontological guilt total score (α = .90), while Empathy and Harm scores can be summed to obtain Altruistic guilt total score (α = .90).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of its latent structure pointed at 4 factors: Moral Norm Violation (MNV), which assesses the fear of having outraged an authority and the attempt to prevent guilt by conforming to moral norms; “Moral Dirtiness” (MODI), measuring the tendency to experience moral disgust towards oneself; “Empathy”, specifically assessing the tendency to feel guilty for the misfortune of others; and “Harm”, measuring the propensity to feel and prevent guilt resulting from harming others. The MOGS has shown good construct validity, and the four subscales and the entire MOGS presented good reliability indices (αMNV = 0.82; αHarm = 0.81; αEmpathy = 0.82; αMODI = 0.70; αTotal = 0.87) [ 2 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to experience deontological guilt (DG), the transgression of an interiorized moral norm is necessary and sufficient, while in order to experience altruistic guilt (AG), the failure of an altruistic goal and the presence of a victim are necessary, even if no moral norm has been trespassed [ 1 ]. The first empirical tool allowing us to measure different types of guilt according to moral orientation is the 17-items Moral Orientation Guilt Scale (MOGS), recently developed and validated by the authors [ 2 ]. The MOGS identifies four different factors:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moral Orientation Guilt Scale (MOGS) [37]. The MOGS, a 17-item scale measures individuals' propensity to experience different types of guilt (moral norm violation, moral dirtiness, empathy, and harm) linked to deontological values.…”
Section: Other Psychological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%