2011
DOI: 10.1108/14779961111123205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral judgment in computing undergraduates

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether, when teaching professional ethics, the educational interventions have any effect on improving students' moral decisions. One method often used to measure change is the well‐established defining issues test – an American test based on Kohlberg's stage theory.Design/methodology/approachUsing this test, two before‐and‐after studies were carried out on cross‐cultural cohorts of first year computing undergraduates which both received the same lectures, debates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moral judgment is one of the four components of cognitive developmental psychology, which was developed by Lawrence Kohlberg (Jagger, ). Banerjee et al .…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moral judgment is one of the four components of cognitive developmental psychology, which was developed by Lawrence Kohlberg (Jagger, ). Banerjee et al .…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moral judgment is one of the four components of cognitive developmental psychology, which was developed by Lawrence Kohlberg (Jagger, 2011). Banerjee et al (1998) defined moral judgment as the way a person reasons when faced with an ethical situation.…”
Section: Moral Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have utilised the DIT in an attempt to measure the success of educational intervention of various types but results have been varied with some showing a positive change in DIT scores after the delivery of targeted ethics teaching, and some no change or a decline (Staehr and Bryme, 2003, p. 233; Poneman, 1993, p. 207; Tennant, 2002, p. 2657; Woodward and Ashby, 2006, p. 6; Jagger, 2011, pp. 27‐31).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%