Moral Foundations of the Learning Organization

Abstract

Characteristics of learning organizations (LOs) include free exchange across communities of practice, networked knowledge and experience, continual improvement, learning leadership, open dialogue, continual transformation and protean psychological contracts. I identify I 0 moral foundations of LOs. They would house communal business cultures, accountable to Aristotelian and Kantian ethics. Power blocs would allow space for quieter, less obtrusive contributions to be valued, rather than imposing exploitative or mercenary discourses of appropriation. LOs would strive to improve their records of meeting stakeholders' moral claims. They would respond humbly to stakeholder criticism. Leadership would be humble and virtue seeking. There would be civil liberties. LOs would build, debug and update their own moral traditions. They would treat employees with compassion. They would also give special help and support to those challenged by obsolescence. There would be transparent operations and decision-making, engendering critical trust. I suggest how aspiring LOs may try to overcome problems of human defensiveness, limited moral reasoning capacity and fragmented moral terrain, and build these 10 moral foundations.

European perspectives on the learning organisation

“…(c) 'Learning organisations are organisations where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire and where people are continually learning how to learn together' (Senge, 1990: p.3). In a comprehensive review of the learning organisation literature, Snell (2001) states that although there is a profusion of learning organisation paradigms, there is coherence among them around a commitment to collective learning and development.…”

Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain

“…Transformational leadership, which has been contrasted with Ftraditional_ or Ftransactional_ leadership, includes a wide strategic vision about the advantages of change and adaptation (Dess & Picken, 2000), significant interest in a communicative culture (Hult, Ferrell, Hurley, & Giunipero, 2000), attention to the development of people (Barczak & Wilemon, 1992), and acceptance of mistakes (Snell, 2001). It is important to highlight that managers' perceptions about their own roles in their organizations strongly influence their capability to promote this kind of leadership in an organization.…”

Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework

“…This approach finds strong resonance in the field of organisational learning, since OL theorists view the moral and ethical aspects of learning as an important topic in need of investigation (Argyris and Schön, 1996). Moreover, it has been suggested that the so-called ''learning corporation'' approach also implies basic underlying ethical principles (Snell, 2001). Therefore, one way to address the limitations 360…”