Kinship, Networks, and Exchange 1998
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511896620.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Economy and Self-interest: Kinship, Friendship, and Exchange among the Pokot (N.W. Kenya)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
34
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the pastoral mode of production has generally been perceived as mostly driven by natural forces and less through social ties and networks. In contrast to this view, data from a 1987 demographic study of Ngisonyoka Turkana herds in northwestern Kenya, presented in this study, support ethnographic evidence that has long suggested that acquisitions do make an important contribution to herd growth (Bollig, 1998;Gulliver, 1955;Storas, 1997).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…As a result, the pastoral mode of production has generally been perceived as mostly driven by natural forces and less through social ties and networks. In contrast to this view, data from a 1987 demographic study of Ngisonyoka Turkana herds in northwestern Kenya, presented in this study, support ethnographic evidence that has long suggested that acquisitions do make an important contribution to herd growth (Bollig, 1998;Gulliver, 1955;Storas, 1997).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Second, livestock are a volatile form of wealth. Although herds have the capacity to grow, they can also be rapidly, severely, and unpredictably reduced by diseases, droughts, and theft (Bollig 1998;Dahl and Hjort 1976). Any pastoralist would do well to find ways to reduce his or her exposure to risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ecotonal locations allow for interaction between pastoral and agricultural modes of production enacted through various institutionalised cross-ethnic/ cross-economic ties based on inclusive cross-cultural categories (age-grades, marriages, stock and other friendships, various ceremonies etc.) (Loiske 2004;Spear, 1993: 120; see also Bollig, 1998;Conant 1965;Conant, 1966;Hodder, 1982;Kurita, 1983;Östberg, 2004;Pollard et al, in press). Importantly, it is these institutionalised networks that provide the matrix within which agricultural intensification occurs.…”
Section: 'Institutional Exchange Network'mentioning
confidence: 99%