2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral disengagement: A guilt free mechanism for non-green buying behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It infers that both attitude towards the well-being of others and concern for the future influence the anthropocentric perspective of the consumers, which increases the discretion and ministration of the consumers towards the environment as the current environmental circumstances are a threat to others and the future (Coffey, 2021). Also, presently, the environmental situation is extremely hazardous (Sharma and Paço, 2021), which might be the reason for the high impact of general pro-social attitude, which assists in exhibiting the concerns for society and others at present, which leads to caring for the environment, through environmental concern as compared to the influence of generations, and which is a concern for future on environmental concern. However, while assessing the impact of emotional loyalty, it has been found that high and low emotional loyalty has no impact on general pro-social attitude to environmental concern and generations to environmental concern, which indicates that attitude towards others and concern for future which remain the same, irrespective of high or low emotional engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It infers that both attitude towards the well-being of others and concern for the future influence the anthropocentric perspective of the consumers, which increases the discretion and ministration of the consumers towards the environment as the current environmental circumstances are a threat to others and the future (Coffey, 2021). Also, presently, the environmental situation is extremely hazardous (Sharma and Paço, 2021), which might be the reason for the high impact of general pro-social attitude, which assists in exhibiting the concerns for society and others at present, which leads to caring for the environment, through environmental concern as compared to the influence of generations, and which is a concern for future on environmental concern. However, while assessing the impact of emotional loyalty, it has been found that high and low emotional loyalty has no impact on general pro-social attitude to environmental concern and generations to environmental concern, which indicates that attitude towards others and concern for future which remain the same, irrespective of high or low emotional engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is quite possible that understanding the eco-innovation done by the firms might impact the intentions to buy green products. Third, consumers are opting for greener options, and this opportunity can ameliorate policymakers' green strategies and functions (Sharma and Paço, 2021). Fourth, consumers are cynical regarding green products (Sarabia-Andreu et al, 2019), and apprehension regarding greenwashing is intensifying .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication with customers serves as an essential strategy to deliver value in marketing through advertisements or promotions as well as through the translation of images and concepts to consumers. Research suggests that consumers occasionally encounter morality calls to be green by buying environmentally friendly products, and they may feel guilty if they do not follow through on this [ 33 ]. However, this feeling is not always translated into purchase behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this feeling is not always translated into purchase behavior. The literature implies that brilliant images sell better than “the sense of guilt” [ 33 , 34 ]. As value is never appreciated via guilt, it lacks meaning and purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moral justification can be perceived as a mechanism to disengage ones (unethical) actions from moral standards (moral disengagement, see Bandura, 1999). Sharma and Paço (2021) show that consumers can use moral disengagement to justify nonsustainable choices. However, in this study we will study if sustainability claims can be used to morally justify self-indulgent behavior.…”
Section: Advertising Frames Elicit Different Types Of Justificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%