2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood symptoms predict COVID-19 pandemic distress but not vice versa: An 18-month longitudinal study

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has had medical, economic and behavioral implications on a global scale, with research emerging to indicate that it negatively impacted the population’s mental health as well. The current study utilizes longitudinal data to assess whether the pandemic led to an increase in depression and anxiety across participants or whether a diathesis-stress model would be more appropriate. An international group of 218 participants completed measures of depression, anxiety, rumination and distress int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there was a significantly higher ratio of mood and organic mental disorders during this period. Several studies have indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic had a severe impact on the development of mood disorders [9,[52][53][54]. Our results support these observations and suggest the importance of co-morbid SUDs as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, there was a significantly higher ratio of mood and organic mental disorders during this period. Several studies have indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic had a severe impact on the development of mood disorders [9,[52][53][54]. Our results support these observations and suggest the importance of co-morbid SUDs as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While some studies show an exacerbation in NEs following the outbreak (e.g., Cavicchioli et al, 2021), others report no pandemic effects on NEs (e.g., on symptoms of anxiety as in O’Connor et al, 2021). Such inconsistency can be seen in either longitudinal or cross-sectional designs, with some reporting an elevation (e.g., Pierce et al, 2020; UK sample), whereas others reporting no significant change (e.g., Johansson et al, 2021; Swedish sample; Katz & Yovel, 2022, US sample) or even a reduction in NEs over time (e.g., O’Connor et al 2021; UK sample). For example, in their study, Robinson et al (2022) meta-analyzed longitudinal studies on changes in NEs from before to during-pandemic times, and reported a decrease in NEs over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%