1972
DOI: 10.15288/qjsa.1972.33.979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood Changes during Three Conditions of Alcohol lntake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects in alcohol experiments commonly report that they feel more talkative, indicating that affiliative motivation may be part of the transient euphoric syndrome, found particuarly in male social drinkers (Ekman, Frankenhaeuser, Goldberg, Bjerver, Jarpe & Myrsten, 1963;Ekman, Frankenhaeuser, Goldberg, Hagdahl & Myrsten, 1964;Myrsten, 1971; see also the recent review by Freed, 1978). Myrsten (1971) observed that euphoric effect increased when the subjects were given occasion to talk to each other compared to conditions when they were not, and laboratory settings of a more impersonal nature have sometimes failed to induce euphoric effect altogether (Frankenhaeuser, Myrsten & Jarpe, 1962;Warren & Raynes, 1972). Since affiliative subjects have been shown to look more at each other in affXative situations (Exline,1%3), increased EC should follow as a consequence of increased affiliative motivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects in alcohol experiments commonly report that they feel more talkative, indicating that affiliative motivation may be part of the transient euphoric syndrome, found particuarly in male social drinkers (Ekman, Frankenhaeuser, Goldberg, Bjerver, Jarpe & Myrsten, 1963;Ekman, Frankenhaeuser, Goldberg, Hagdahl & Myrsten, 1964;Myrsten, 1971; see also the recent review by Freed, 1978). Myrsten (1971) observed that euphoric effect increased when the subjects were given occasion to talk to each other compared to conditions when they were not, and laboratory settings of a more impersonal nature have sometimes failed to induce euphoric effect altogether (Frankenhaeuser, Myrsten & Jarpe, 1962;Warren & Raynes, 1972). Since affiliative subjects have been shown to look more at each other in affXative situations (Exline,1%3), increased EC should follow as a consequence of increased affiliative motivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased friendliness resulting from E has been reported in experiments with the POMS.2. 25 In our experiment, friendliness de-creased further when Z was combined with E, indicating that Z modifies the effect of E on mood and, therefore, that the drugs interact centrally. Since E has positive reinforcing and aversive effects,I8 it is possible that Z acts by modifying the balance of such effects, either by making the subjects perceive E as less reinforcing, more aversive, or both, which might lead to decreased E intake.Ig Experiments in rats indicate that Z can induce marked aversion to E.14 Since the effects of Z on E drinking are not related to a toxic, aversive, alcohol-sensitizing reaction or antidepressant or anxiolytic effects,'"t is possible that the drug interferes with the neurobiologic mechanism regulating E intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Effects of E on mood not only depend on dose but also on the psychophysiologic state of the subject and the context in which drinking occur^.^^ 15. 20, 25 We must therefore be cautious in interpreting mood effects in our experimental setting. Decreased friendliness resulting from E has been reported in experiments with the POMS.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of moderate alcohol consumption on mood may depend on several interacting factors, including the rise or decline of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) [4] [6] , the pre-drinking mood state of the drinker [7] and factors such as the social context of drinking [8] , [9] , and expectancy of mood effects [10] , [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%